The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 83

The Marriage Institution

Chief of Seraphim

7. The Dissolution of Wedlock

83:7.1In the early evo­lu­tion of the mar­i­tal mores, mar­riage was a loose union which could be ter­mi­nated at will, and the chil­dren al­ways fol­lowed the mother; the mother-child bond is in­stinc­tive and has func­tioned re­gard­less of the de­vel­op­men­tal stage of the mores.

83:7.2Among prim­i­tive peo­ples only about one half the mar­riages proved sat­is­fac­tory. The most fre­quent cause for sep­a­ra­tion was bar­ren­ness, which was al­ways blamed on the wife; and child­less wives were be­lieved to be­come snakes in the spirit world. Un­der the more prim­i­tive mores, di­vorce was had at the op­tion of the man alone, and these stan­dards have per­sisted to the twen­ti­eth cen­tury among some peo­ples.

83:7.3As the mores evolved, cer­tain tribes de­vel­oped two forms of mar­riage: the or­di­nary, which per­mit­ted di­vorce, and the priest mar­riage, which did not al­low for sep­a­ra­tion. The in­au­gu­ra­tion of wife pur­chase and wife dowry, by in­tro­duc­ing a prop­erty penalty for mar­riage fail­ure, did much to lessen sep­a­ra­tion. And, in­deed, many mod­ern unions are sta­bi­lized by this an­cient prop­erty fac­tor.

83:7.4The so­cial pres­sure of com­mu­nity stand­ing and prop­erty priv­i­leges has al­ways been po­tent in the main­te­nance of the mar­riage taboos and mores. Down through the ages mar­riage has made steady prog­ress and stands on ad­vanced ground in the mod­ern world, not­with­stand­ing that it is threat­en­ingly as­sailed by wide­spread dis­sat­is­fac­tion among those peo­ples where in­di­vid­ual choice—a new lib­erty—fig­ures most largely. While these up­heavals of ad­just­ment ap­pear among the more pro­gres­sive races as a re­sult of sud­denly ac­cel­er­ated so­cial evo­lu­tion, among the less ad­vanced peo­ples mar­riage con­tin­ues to thrive and slowly im­prove un­der the guid­ance of the older mores.

83:7.5The new and sud­den sub­sti­tu­tion of the more ideal but ex­tremely in­di­vid­u­al­is­tic love mo­tive in mar­riage for the older and long-es­tab­lished prop­erty mo­tive, has un­avoid­ably caused the mar­riage in­sti­tu­tion to be­come tem­porar­ily un­sta­ble. Man’s mar­riage mo­tives have al­ways far tran­scended ac­tual mar­riage morals, and in the nine­teenth and twen­ti­eth cen­turies the Oc­ci­den­tal ideal of mar­riage has sud­denly far out­run the self-cen­tered and but par­tially con­trolled sex im­pulses of the races. The pres­ence of large num­bers of un­mar­ried per­sons in any so­ci­ety in­di­cates the tem­po­rary break­down or the tran­si­tion of the mores.

83:7.6The real test of mar­riage, all down through the ages, has been that con­tin­u­ous in­ti­macy which is in­es­cap­able in all fam­ily life. Two pam­pered and spoiled youths, ed­u­cated to ex­pect ev­ery in­dul­gence and full grat­i­fi­ca­tion of van­ity and ego, can hardly hope to make a great suc­cess of mar­riage and home build­ing—a life­long part­ner­ship of self-ef­face­ment, com­pro­mise, de­vo­tion, and un­selfish ded­i­ca­tion to child cul­ture.

83:7.7The high de­gree of imag­i­na­tion and fan­tas­tic ro­mance en­ter­ing into court­ship is largely re­spon­si­ble for the in­creas­ing di­vorce ten­den­cies among mod­ern Oc­ci­den­tal peo­ples, all of which is fur­ther com­pli­cated by woman’s greater per­sonal free­dom and in­creased eco­nomic lib­erty. Easy di­vorce, when the re­sult of lack of self-con­trol or fail­ure of nor­mal per­son­al­ity ad­just­ment, only leads di­rectly back to those crude so­ci­etal stages from which man has emerged so re­cently and as the re­sult of so much per­sonal an­guish and racial suf­fer­ing.

83:7.8But just so long as so­ci­ety fails to prop­erly ed­u­cate chil­dren and youths, so long as the so­cial or­der fails to pro­vide ad­e­quate pre­mar­i­tal train­ing, and so long as un­wise and im­ma­ture youth­ful ide­al­ism is to be the ar­biter of the en­trance upon mar­riage, just so long will di­vorce re­main preva­lent. And in so far as the so­cial group falls short of pro­vid­ing mar­riage prepa­ra­tion for youths, to that ex­tent must di­vorce func­tion as the so­cial safety valve which pre­vents still worse sit­u­a­tions dur­ing the ages of the rapid growth of the evolv­ing mores.

83:7.9The an­cients seem to have re­garded mar­riage just about as se­ri­ously as some pres­ent-day peo­ple do. And it does not ap­pear that many of the hasty and un­suc­cess­ful mar­riages of mod­ern times are much of an im­prove­ment over the an­cient prac­tices of qual­i­fy­ing young men and women for mat­ing. The great in­con­sis­tency of mod­ern so­ci­ety is to ex­alt love and to ide­al­ize mar­riage while dis­ap­prov­ing of the fullest ex­am­i­na­tion of both.

The 1955 readings