The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 83

The Marriage Institution

Chief of Seraphim

3. Purchase and Dowry

83:3.1The an­cients mis­trusted love and prom­ises; they thought that abid­ing unions must be guar­an­teed by some tan­gi­ble se­cu­rity, prop­erty. For this rea­son, the pur­chase price of a wife was re­garded as a for­feit or de­posit which the hus­band was doomed to lose in case of di­vorce or de­ser­tion. Once the pur­chase price of a bride had been paid, many tribes per­mit­ted the hus­band’s brand to be burned upon her. Africans still buy their wives. A love wife, or a white man’s wife, they com­pare to a cat be­cause she costs noth­ing.

83:3.2The bride shows were oc­ca­sions for dress­ing up and dec­o­rat­ing daugh­ters for pub­lic ex­hi­bi­tion with the idea of their bring­ing higher prices as wives. But they were not sold as an­i­mals—among the later tribes such a wife was not trans­fer­able. Nei­ther was her pur­chase al­ways just a cold-blooded money trans­ac­tion; ser­vice was equiv­a­lent to cash in the pur­chase of a wife. If an oth­er­wise de­sir­able man could not pay for his wife, he could be adopted as a son by the girl’s fa­ther and then could marry. And if a poor man sought a wife and could not meet the price de­manded by a grasp­ing fa­ther, the el­ders would of­ten bring pres­sure to bear upon the fa­ther which would re­sult in a mod­i­fi­ca­tion of his de­mands, or else there might be an elope­ment.

83:3.3As civ­i­liza­tion pro­gressed, fa­thers did not like to ap­pear to sell their daugh­ters, and so, while con­tin­u­ing to ac­cept the bride pur­chase price, they ini­ti­ated the cus­tom of giv­ing the pair valu­able pres­ents which about equaled the pur­chase money. And upon the later dis­con­tin­u­ance of pay­ment for the bride, these pres­ents be­came the bride’s dowry.

83:3.4The idea of a dowry was to con­vey the im­pres­sion of the bride’s in­de­pen­dence, to sug­gest far re­moval from the times of slave wives and prop­erty com­pan­ions. A man could not di­vorce a dow­ered wife with­out pay­ing back the dowry in full. Among some tribes a mu­tual de­posit was made with the par­ents of both bride and groom to be for­feited in case ei­ther de­serted the other, in re­al­ity a mar­riage bond. Dur­ing the pe­riod of tran­si­tion from pur­chase to dowry, if the wife were pur­chased, the chil­dren be­longed to the fa­ther; if not, they be­longed to the wife’s fam­ily.