The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 83

The Marriage Institution

Chief of Seraphim

6. True Monogamy—Pair Marriage

83:6.1Mo­nog­amy is monopoly; it is good for those who at­tain this de­sir­able state, but it tends to work a bi­o­logic hard­ship on those who are not so for­tu­nate. But quite re­gard­less of the ef­fect on the in­di­vid­ual, mo­nog­amy is de­cid­edly best for the chil­dren.

83:6.2The ear­li­est mo­nog­amy was due to force of cir­cum­stances, pov­erty. Mo­nog­amy is cul­tural and so­ci­etal, ar­ti­fi­cial and un­nat­u­ral, that is, un­nat­u­ral to evo­lu­tion­ary man. It was wholly nat­u­ral to the purer Nod­ites and Adamites and has been of great cul­tural value to all ad­vanced races.

83:6.3The Chaldean tribes rec­og­nized the right of a wife to im­pose a pre­mar­i­tal pledge upon her spouse not to take a sec­ond wife or con­cu­bine; both the Greeks and the Ro­mans fa­vored monog­a­mous mar­riage. An­ces­tor wor­ship has al­ways fos­tered mo­nog­amy, as has the Chris­tian er­ror of re­gard­ing mar­riage as a sacra­ment. Even the el­e­va­tion of the stan­dard of liv­ing has con­sis­tently mil­i­tated against plu­ral wives. By the time of Mi­chael’s ad­vent on Uran­tia prac­ti­cally all of the civ­i­lized world had at­tained the level of the­o­ret­i­cal mo­nog­amy. But this pas­sive mo­nog­amy did not mean that man­kind had be­come ha­bit­u­ated to the prac­tice of real pair mar­riage.

83:6.4While pur­su­ing the monogamic goal of the ideal pair mar­riage, which is, af­ter all, some­thing of a mo­nop­o­lis­tic sex as­so­ci­a­tion, so­ci­ety must not over­look the un­en­vi­able sit­u­a­tion of those un­for­tu­nate men and women who fail to find a place in this new and im­proved so­cial or­der, even when hav­ing done their best to co-op­er­ate with, and en­ter into, its re­quire­ments. Fail­ure to gain mates in the so­cial arena of com­pe­ti­tion may be due to in­sur­mount­able dif­fi­cul­ties or mul­ti­tudi­nous re­stric­tions which the cur­rent mores have im­posed. Truly, mo­nog­amy is ideal for those who are in, but it must in­evitably work great hard­ship on those who are left out in the cold of soli­tary ex­is­tence.

83:6.5Al­ways have the un­for­tu­nate few had to suf­fer that the ma­jor­ity might ad­vance un­der the de­vel­op­ing mores of evolv­ing civ­i­liza­tion; but al­ways should the fa­vored ma­jor­ity look with kind­ness and con­sid­er­a­tion on their less for­tu­nate fel­lows who must pay the price of fail­ure to at­tain mem­ber­ship in the ranks of those ideal sex part­ner­ships which af­ford the sat­is­fac­tion of all bi­o­logic urges un­der the sanc­tion of the high­est mores of ad­vanc­ing so­cial evo­lu­tion.

83:6.6Mo­nog­amy al­ways has been, now is, and for­ever will be the ide­al­is­tic goal of hu­man sex evo­lu­tion. This ideal of true pair mar­riage en­tails self-de­nial, and there­fore does it so of­ten fail just be­cause one or both of the con­tract­ing par­ties are de­fi­cient in that acme of all hu­man virtues, rugged self-con­trol.

83:6.7Mo­nog­amy is the yard­stick which mea­sures the ad­vance of so­cial civ­i­liza­tion as dis­tin­guished from purely bi­o­logic evo­lu­tion. Mo­nog­amy is not nec­es­sar­ily bi­o­logic or nat­u­ral, but it is in­dis­pens­able to the im­me­di­ate main­te­nance and fur­ther de­vel­op­ment of so­cial civ­i­liza­tion. It con­tributes to a del­i­cacy of sen­ti­ment, a re­fine­ment of moral char­ac­ter, and a spir­i­tual growth which are ut­terly im­pos­si­ble in polygamy. A woman never can be­come an ideal mother when she is all the while com­pelled to en­gage in ri­valry for her hus­band’s af­fec­tions.

83:6.8Pair mar­riage fa­vors and fos­ters that in­ti­mate un­der­stand­ing and ef­fec­tive co-op­er­a­tion which is best for pa­ren­tal hap­pi­ness, child wel­fare, and so­cial ef­fi­ciency. Mar­riage, which be­gan in crude co­er­cion, is grad­u­ally evolv­ing into a mag­nif­i­cent in­sti­tu­tion of self-cul­ture, self-con­trol, self-ex­pres­sion, and self-per­pet­u­a­tion.