The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Read through

Mount Sinai

8 paragraphs · about 3 minutes

Every paragraph the index cites under Mount Sinai, once, in the order of the book. Beside each stand the entries that cite it.

77:4.11Some of the early as­so­ciates of Van sub­se­quently set­tled about the shores of the lake which still bears his name, and their tra­di­tions grew up about this lo­cal­ity. Ararat be­came their sa­cred moun­tain, hav­ing much the same mean­ing to later-day Van­ites that Sinai had to the He­brews. Ten thou­sand years ago the Van­ite an­ces­tors of the As­syr­i­ans taught that their moral law of seven com­mand­ments had been given to Van by the Gods upon Mount Ararat. They firmly be­lieved that Van and his as­so­ciate Amadon were taken alive from the planet while they were up on the moun­tain en­gaged in wor­ship.

77:4.12Mount Ararat was the sa­cred moun­tain of north­ern Mes­o­po­ta­mia, and since much of your tra­di­tion of these an­cient times was ac­quired in con­nec­tion with the Baby­lo­nian story of the flood, it is not sur­pris­ing that Mount Ararat and its re­gion were wo­ven into the later Jew­ish story of Noah and the uni­ver­sal flood.

80:6.3When the last ex­o­dus from the Eu­phrates val­ley oc­curred, Egypt was for­tu­nate in gain­ing so many of the most skill­ful artists and ar­ti­sans. These And­ite ar­ti­sans found them­selves quite at home in that they were thor­oughly fa­mil­iar with river life, its floods, ir­ri­ga­tions, and dry sea­sons. They en­joyed the shel­tered po­si­tion of the Nile val­ley; they were there much less sub­ject to hos­tile raids and at­tacks than along the Eu­phrates. And they added greatly to the met­al­work­ing skill of the Egyp­tians. Here they worked iron ores com­ing from Mount Sinai in­stead of from the Black Sea re­gions.

94:12.1The great weak­ness in the cos­mol­ogy of Bud­dhism was two­fold: its con­tam­i­na­tion with many of the su­per­sti­tions of In­dia and China and its sub­li­ma­tion of Gau­tama, first as the en­light­ened one, and then as the Eter­nal Bud­dha. Just as Chris­tian­ity has suf­fered from the ab­sorp­tion of much er­ro­neous hu­man phi­los­o­phy, so does Bud­dhism bear its hu­man birth­mark. But the teach­ings of Gau­tama have con­tin­ued to evolve dur­ing the past two and one-half mil­len­ni­ums. The con­cept of Bud­dha, to an en­light­ened Bud­dhist, is no more the hu­man per­son­al­ity of Gau­tama than the con­cept of Je­ho­vah is iden­ti­cal with the spirit de­mon of Ho­reb to an en­light­ened Chris­tian. Paucity of ter­mi­nol­ogy, to­gether with the sen­ti­men­tal re­ten­tion of olden nomen­cla­ture, is of­ten provoca­tive of the fail­ure to un­der­stand the true sig­nif­i­cance of the evo­lu­tion of re­li­gious con­cepts.

96:1.31. Yah­weh was the god of the south­ern Pales­tinian tribes, who as­so­ci­ated this con­cept of de­ity with Mount Ho­reb, the Sinai vol­cano. Yah­weh was merely one of the hun­dreds and thou­sands of na­ture gods which held the at­ten­tion and claimed the wor­ship of the Semitic tribes and peo­ples.

96:1.4–10 · seven paragraphs not cited here ·

96:1.42. El Elyon. For cen­turies af­ter Mel­chiz­e­dek’s so­journ at Salem his doc­trine of De­ity per­sisted in var­i­ous ver­sions but was gen­er­ally con­noted by the term El Elyon, the Most High God of heaven. Many Semites, in­clud­ing the im­me­di­ate de­scen­dants of Abra­ham, at var­i­ous times wor­shiped both Yah­weh and El Elyon.

96:1.53. El Shad­dai. It is dif­fi­cult to ex­plain what El Shad­dai stood for. This idea of God was a com­pos­ite de­rived from the teach­ings of Amen­emope’s Book of Wis­dom mod­i­fied by Ikh­na­ton’s doc­trine of Aton and fur­ther in­flu­enced by Mel­chiz­e­dek’s teach­ings em­bod­ied in the con­cept of El Elyon. But as the con­cept of El Shad­dai per­me­ated the He­brew mind, it be­came thor­oughly col­ored with the Yah­weh be­liefs of the desert.

96:1.6One of the dom­i­nant ideas of the re­li­gion of this era was the Egyp­tian con­cept of di­vine Prov­i­dence, the teach­ing that ma­te­rial pros­per­ity was a re­ward for serv­ing El Shad­dai.

96:1.74. El. Amid all this con­fu­sion of ter­mi­nol­ogy and hazi­ness of con­cept, many de­vout be­liev­ers sin­cerely en­deav­ored to wor­ship all of these evolv­ing ideas of di­vin­ity, and there grew up the prac­tice of re­fer­ring to this com­pos­ite De­ity as El. And this term in­cluded still other of the Bed­ouin na­ture gods.

96:1.85. Elo­him. In Kish and Ur there long per­sisted Sume­rian-Chaldean groups who taught a three-in-one God con­cept founded on the tra­di­tions of the days of Adam and Mel­chiz­e­dek. This doc­trine was car­ried to Egypt, where this Trin­ity was wor­shiped un­der the name of Elo­him, or in the sin­gu­lar as Eloah. The philo­sophic cir­cles of Egypt and later Alexan­drian teach­ers of He­braic ex­trac­tion taught this unity of plu­ral­is­tic Gods, and many of Moses’ ad­vis­ers at the time of the ex­o­dus be­lieved in this Trin­ity. But the con­cept of the trini­tar­ian Elo­him never be­came a real part of He­brew the­ol­ogy un­til af­ter they had come un­der the po­lit­i­cal in­flu­ence of the Baby­lo­ni­ans.

96:1.96. Sundry names. The Semites dis­liked to speak the name of their De­ity, and they there­fore re­sorted to nu­mer­ous ap­pel­la­tions from time to time, such as: The Spirit of God, The Lord, The An­gel of the Lord, The Al­mighty, The Holy One, The Most High, Adonai, The An­cient of Days, The Lord God of Is­rael, The Cre­ator of Heaven and Earth, Kyrios, Jah, The Lord of Hosts, and The Fa­ther in Heaven.

96:1.10Je­ho­vah is a term which in re­cent times has been em­ployed to des­ig­nate the com­pleted con­cept of Yah­weh which fi­nally evolved in the long He­brew ex­pe­ri­ence. But the name Je­ho­vah did not come into use un­til fif­teen hun­dred years af­ter the times of Je­sus.

96:1.11Up to about 2000 B.C., Mount Sinai was in­ter­mit­tently ac­tive as a vol­cano, oc­ca­sional erup­tions oc­cur­ring as late as the time of the so­journ of the Is­raelites in this re­gion. The fire and smoke, to­gether with the thun­der­ous det­o­na­tions as­so­ci­ated with the erup­tions of this vol­canic moun­tain, all im­pressed and awed the Bed­ou­ins of the sur­round­ing re­gions and caused them greatly to fear Yah­weh. This spirit of Mount Ho­reb later be­came the god of the He­brew Semites, and they even­tu­ally be­lieved him to be su­preme over all other gods.

96:4.4The fact that Yah­weh was the god of the flee­ing He­brews ex­plains why they tar­ried so long be­fore the holy moun­tain of Sinai, and why they there re­ceived the ten com­mand­ments which Moses pro­mul­gated in the name of Yah­weh, the god of Ho­reb. Dur­ing this lengthy so­journ be­fore Sinai the re­li­gious cer­e­mo­ni­als of the newly evolv­ing He­brew wor­ship were fur­ther per­fected.

96:4.5It does not ap­pear that Moses would ever have suc­ceeded in the es­tab­lish­ment of his some­what ad­vanced cer­e­mo­nial wor­ship and in keep­ing his fol­low­ers in­tact for a quar­ter of a cen­tury had it not been for the vi­o­lent erup­tion of Ho­reb dur­ing the third week of their wor­ship­ful so­journ at its base. “The moun­tain of Yah­weh was con­sumed in fire, and the smoke as­cended like the smoke of a fur­nace, and the whole moun­tain quaked greatly.” In view of this cat­a­clysm it is not sur­pris­ing that Moses could im­press upon his breth­ren the teach­ing that their God was “mighty, ter­ri­ble, a de­vour­ing fire, fear­ful, and all-pow­er­ful.”

Onward

Cited alongside: volcanoes, Yahweh, Mesopotamia, Mount Ararat