The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Read through

Eskimos

18 paragraphs · about 7 minutes

Every paragraph the index cites under Eskimos, once, in the order of the book. Beside each stand the entries that cite it.

61:6.3This event oc­curred at about the time of the be­gin­ning of the third glacial ad­vance; thus it may be seen that your early an­ces­tors were born and bred in a stim­u­lat­ing, in­vig­o­rat­ing, and dif­fi­cult en­vi­ron­ment. And the sole sur­vivors of these Uran­tia abo­rig­ines, the Es­ki­mos, even now pre­fer to dwell in frigid north­ern climes.

63:4.1Prim­i­tive man—the An­don­ites—had black eyes and a swarthy com­plex­ion, some­thing of a cross be­tween yel­low and red. Melanin is a col­or­ing sub­stance which is found in the skins of all hu­man be­ings. It is the orig­i­nal An­donic skin pig­ment. In gen­eral ap­pear­ance and skin color these early An­don­ites more nearly re­sem­bled the pres­ent-day Es­kimo than any other type of liv­ing hu­man be­ings. They were the first crea­tures to use the skins of an­i­mals as a pro­tec­tion against cold; they had lit­tle more hair on their bod­ies than pres­ent-day hu­mans.

64:2.5The Fox­hall peo­ples were far­thest west and suc­ceeded in re­tain­ing much of the An­donic cul­ture; they also pre­served their knowl­edge of flint­work­ing, which they trans­mit­ted to their de­scen­dants, the an­cient an­ces­tors of the Es­ki­mos.

64:2.6 · one paragraph not cited here ·

64:2.6Though the re­mains of the Fox­hall peo­ples were the last to be dis­cov­ered in Eng­land, these An­don­ites were re­ally the first hu­man be­ings to live in those re­gions. At that time the land bridge still con­nected France with Eng­land; and since most of the early set­tle­ments of the An­don de­scen­dants were lo­cated along the rivers and seashores of that early day, they are now un­der the wa­ters of the En­glish Chan­nel and the North Sea, but some three or four are still above wa­ter on the En­glish coast.

64:2.7Many of the more in­tel­li­gent and spir­i­tual of the Fox­hall peo­ples main­tained their racial su­pe­ri­or­ity and per­pet­u­ated their prim­i­tive re­li­gious cus­toms. And these peo­ple, as they were later ad­mixed with sub­se­quent stocks, jour­neyed on west from Eng­land af­ter a later ice vis­i­ta­tion and have sur­vived as the pres­ent-day Es­ki­mos.

64:7.19About five thou­sand years ago a chance meet­ing oc­curred be­tween an In­dian tribe and a lone Es­kimo group on the south­east­ern shores of Hud­son Bay. These two tribes found it dif­fi­cult to com­mu­ni­cate with each other, but very soon they in­ter­mar­ried with the re­sult that these Es­ki­mos were even­tu­ally ab­sorbed by the more nu­mer­ous red men. And this rep­re­sents the only con­tact of the North Amer­i­can red man with any other hu­man stock down to about one thou­sand years ago, when the white man first chanced to land on the At­lantic coast.

65:2.7The frog is one of the ear­li­est of sur­viv­ing hu­man-race an­ces­tors, but it also failed to pro­gress, per­sist­ing to­day much as in those re­mote times. The frog is the only species an­ces­tor of the early dawn races now liv­ing on the face of the earth. The hu­man race has no sur­viv­ing an­ces­try be­tween the frog and the Es­kimo.

70:1.2War is an an­i­mal­is­tic re­ac­tion to mis­un­der­stand­ings and ir­ri­ta­tions; peace at­tends upon the civ­i­lized so­lu­tion of all such prob­lems and dif­fi­cul­ties. The San­gik races, to­gether with the later de­te­ri­o­rated Adamites and Nod­ites, were all bel­liger­ent. The An­don­ites were early taught the golden rule, and, even to­day, their Es­kimo de­scen­dants live very much by that code; cus­tom is strong among them, and they are fairly free from vi­o­lent an­tag­o­nisms.

70:10.11One of the ear­li­est for­mu­la­tions of ad­vanced tribal law had to do with the tak­ing over of the blood feud as a tribal af­fair. But strange to re­late, even then a man could kill his wife with­out pun­ish­ment pro­vided he had fully paid for her. The Es­ki­mos of to­day, how­ever, still leave the penalty for a crime, even for mur­der, to be de­creed and ad­min­is­tered by the fam­ily wronged.

79:5.7The North Amer­i­can In­di­ans never came in con­tact with even the And­ite off­spring of Adam and Eve, hav­ing been dis­pos­sessed of their Asi­atic home­lands some fifty thou­sand years be­fore the com­ing of Adam. Dur­ing the age of And­ite mi­gra­tions the pure red strains were spread­ing out over North Amer­ica as no­madic tribes, hunters who prac­ticed agri­cul­ture to a small ex­tent. These races and cul­tural groups re­mained al­most com­pletely iso­lated from the re­main­der of the world from their ar­rival in the Amer­i­cas down to the end of the first mil­len­nium of the Chris­tian era, when they were dis­cov­ered by the white races of Eu­rope. Up to that time the Es­ki­mos were the near­est to white men the north­ern tribes of red men had ever seen.

79:5.8 · one paragraph not cited here ·

79:5.8The red and the yel­low races are the only hu­man stocks that ever achieved a high de­gree of civ­i­liza­tion apart from the in­flu­ences of the And­ites. The old­est Amerindian cul­ture was the Ona­mo­na­lon­ton cen­ter in Cal­i­for­nia, but this had long since van­ished by 35,000 B.C. In Mex­ico, Cen­tral Amer­ica, and in the moun­tains of South Amer­ica the later and more en­dur­ing civ­i­liza­tions were founded by a race pre­dom­i­nantly red but con­tain­ing a con­sid­er­able ad­mix­ture of the yel­low, or­ange, and blue.

79:5.9These civ­i­liza­tions were evo­lu­tion­ary prod­ucts of the San­giks, not­with­stand­ing that traces of And­ite blood reached Peru. Ex­cept­ing the Es­ki­mos in North Amer­ica and a few Poly­ne­sian And­ites in South Amer­ica, the peo­ples of the West­ern Hemi­sphere had no con­tact with the rest of the world un­til the end of the first mil­len­nium af­ter Christ. In the orig­i­nal Mel­chiz­e­dek plan for the im­prove­ment of the Uran­tia races it had been stip­u­lated that one mil­lion of the pure-line de­scen­dants of Adam should go to up­step the red men of the Amer­i­cas.

81:4.9As these five great racial groups ex­ten­sively in­ter­min­gled, con­tin­ual mix­ture tended to ob­scure the An­donite type by San­gik hered­i­tary dom­i­nance. The Lapps and the Es­ki­mos are blends of An­donite and San­gik-blue races. Their skele­tal struc­tures come the near­est to pre­serv­ing the abo­rig­i­nal An­donic type. But the Adamites and the Nod­ites have be­come so ad­mixed with the other races that they can be de­tected only as a gen­er­al­ized Cau­ca­soid or­der.

84:7.10Love of off­spring is al­most uni­ver­sal and is of dis­tinct sur­vival value. The an­cients al­ways sac­ri­ficed the mother’s in­ter­ests for the wel­fare of the child; an Es­kimo mother even yet licks her baby in lieu of wash­ing. But prim­i­tive moth­ers only nour­ished and cared for their chil­dren when very young; like the an­i­mals, they dis­carded them as soon as they grew up. En­dur­ing and con­tin­u­ous hu­man as­so­ci­a­tions have never been founded on bi­o­logic af­fec­tion alone. The an­i­mals love their chil­dren; man—civ­i­lized man—loves his chil­dren’s chil­dren. The higher the civ­i­liza­tion, the greater the joy of par­ents in the chil­dren’s ad­vance­ment and suc­cess; thus the new and higher re­al­iza­tion of name pride comes into ex­is­tence.

84:7.11–20 · ten paragraphs not cited here ·

84:7.11The large fam­i­lies among an­cient peo­ples were not nec­es­sar­ily af­fec­tional. Many chil­dren were de­sired be­cause:

84:7.121. They were valu­able as la­bor­ers.

84:7.132. They were old-age in­sur­ance.

84:7.143. Daugh­ters were sal­able.

84:7.154. Fam­ily pride re­quired ex­ten­sion of name.

84:7.165. Sons af­forded pro­tec­tion and de­fense.

84:7.176. Ghost fear pro­duced a dread of be­ing alone.

84:7.187. Cer­tain re­li­gions re­quired off­spring.

84:7.19An­ces­tor wor­shipers view the fail­ure to have sons as the su­preme calamity for all time and eter­nity. They de­sire above all else to have sons to of­fi­ci­ate in the post-mortem feasts, to of­fer the re­quired sac­ri­fices for the ghost’s prog­ress through spir­it­land.

84:7.20Among an­cient sav­ages, dis­ci­pline of chil­dren was be­gun very early; and the child early re­al­ized that dis­obe­di­ence meant fail­ure or even death just as it did to the an­i­mals. It is civ­i­liza­tion’s pro­tec­tion of the child from the nat­u­ral con­se­quences of fool­ish con­duct that con­tributes so much to mod­ern in­sub­or­di­na­tion.

84:7.21Es­kimo chil­dren thrive on so lit­tle dis­ci­pline and cor­rec­tion sim­ply be­cause they are nat­u­rally docile lit­tle an­i­mals; the chil­dren of both the red and the yel­low men are al­most equally tractable. But in races con­tain­ing And­ite in­her­i­tance, chil­dren are not so placid; these more imag­i­na­tive and ad­ven­tur­ous youths re­quire more train­ing and dis­ci­pline. Mod­ern prob­lems of child cul­ture are ren­dered in­creas­ingly dif­fi­cult by:

86:5.1The non­ma­te­rial part of man has been var­i­ously termed ghost, spirit, shade, phan­tom, specter, and lat­terly soul. The soul was early man’s dream dou­ble; it was in ev­ery way ex­actly like the mor­tal him­self ex­cept that it was not re­spon­sive to touch. The be­lief in dream dou­bles led di­rectly to the no­tion that all things an­i­mate and inan­i­mate had souls as well as men. This con­cept tended long to per­pet­u­ate the na­ture-spirit be­liefs; the Es­ki­mos still con­ceive that ev­ery­thing in na­ture has a spirit.

86:5.2–16 · 15 paragraphs not cited here ·

86:5.2The ghost soul could be heard and seen, but not touched. Grad­u­ally the dream life of the race so de­vel­oped and ex­panded the ac­tiv­i­ties of this evolv­ing spirit world that death was fi­nally re­garded as “giv­ing up the ghost.” All prim­i­tive tribes, ex­cept those lit­tle above an­i­mals, have de­vel­oped some con­cept of the soul. As civ­i­liza­tion ad­vances, this su­per­sti­tious con­cept of the soul is de­stroyed, and man is wholly de­pen­dent on rev­e­la­tion and per­sonal re­li­gious ex­pe­ri­ence for his new idea of the soul as the joint cre­ation of the God-know­ing mor­tal mind and its in­dwelling di­vine spirit, the Thought Ad­juster.

86:5.3Early mor­tals usu­ally failed to dif­fer­en­ti­ate the con­cepts of an in­dwelling spirit and a soul of evo­lu­tion­ary na­ture. The sav­age was much con­fused as to whether the ghost soul was na­tive to the body or was an ex­ter­nal agency in pos­ses­sion of the body. The ab­sence of rea­soned thought in the pres­ence of per­plex­ity ex­plains the gross in­con­sis­ten­cies of the sav­age view of souls, ghosts, and spir­its.

86:5.4The soul was thought of as be­ing re­lated to the body as the per­fume to the flower. The an­cients be­lieved that the soul could leave the body in var­i­ous ways, as in:

86:5.51. Or­di­nary and tran­sient faint­ing.

86:5.62. Sleep­ing, nat­u­ral dream­ing.

86:5.73. Coma and un­con­scious­ness as­so­ci­ated with dis­ease and ac­ci­dents.

86:5.84. Death, per­ma­nent de­par­ture.

86:5.9The sav­age looked upon sneez­ing as an abortive at­tempt of the soul to es­cape from the body. Be­ing awake and on guard, the body was able to thwart the soul’s at­tempted es­cape. Later on, sneez­ing was al­ways ac­com­pa­nied by some re­li­gious ex­pres­sion, such as “God bless you!”

86:5.10Early in evo­lu­tion sleep was re­garded as prov­ing that the ghost soul could be ab­sent from the body, and it was be­lieved that it could be called back by speak­ing or shout­ing the sleeper’s name. In other forms of un­con­scious­ness the soul was thought to be far­ther away, per­haps try­ing to es­cape for good—im­pend­ing death. Dreams were looked upon as the ex­pe­ri­ences of the soul dur­ing sleep while tem­porar­ily ab­sent from the body. The sav­age be­lieves his dreams to be just as real as any part of his wak­ing ex­pe­ri­ence. The an­cients made a prac­tice of awak­ing sleep­ers grad­u­ally so that the soul might have time to get back into the body.

86:5.11All down through the ages men have stood in awe of the ap­pari­tions of the night sea­son, and the He­brews were no ex­cep­tion. They truly be­lieved that God spoke to them in dreams, de­spite the in­junc­tions of Moses against this idea. And Moses was right, for or­di­nary dreams are not the meth­ods em­ployed by the per­son­al­i­ties of the spir­i­tual world when they seek to com­mu­ni­cate with ma­te­rial be­ings.

86:5.12The an­cients be­lieved that souls could en­ter an­i­mals or even inan­i­mate ob­jects. This cul­mi­nated in the were­wolf ideas of an­i­mal iden­ti­fi­ca­tion. A per­son could be a law-abid­ing cit­i­zen by day, but when he fell asleep, his soul could en­ter a wolf or some other an­i­mal to prowl about on noc­tur­nal depre­da­tions.

86:5.13Prim­i­tive men thought that the soul was as­so­ci­ated with the breath, and that its qual­i­ties could be im­parted or trans­ferred by the breath. The brave chief would breathe upon the new­born child, thereby im­part­ing cour­age. Among early Chris­tians the cer­e­mony of be­stow­ing the Holy Spirit was ac­com­pa­nied by breath­ing on the can­di­dates. Said the Psalmist: “By the word of the Lord were the heav­ens made and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth.” It was long the cus­tom of the el­dest son to try to catch the last breath of his dy­ing fa­ther.

86:5.14The shadow came, later on, to be feared and revered equally with the breath. The re­flec­tion of one­self in the wa­ter was also some­times looked upon as proof of the dou­ble self, and mir­rors were re­garded with su­per­sti­tious awe. Even now many civ­i­lized per­sons turn the mir­ror to the wall in the event of death. Some back­ward tribes still be­lieve that the mak­ing of pic­tures, draw­ings, mod­els, or im­ages re­moves all or a part of the soul from the body; hence such are for­bid­den.

86:5.15The soul was gen­er­ally thought of as be­ing iden­ti­fied with the breath, but it was also lo­cated by var­i­ous peo­ples in the head, hair, heart, liver, blood, and fat. The “cry­ing out of Abel’s blood from the ground” is ex­pres­sive of the one­time be­lief in the pres­ence of the ghost in the blood. The Semites taught that the soul resided in the bod­ily fat, and among many the eat­ing of an­i­mal fat was taboo. Head hunt­ing was a method of cap­tur­ing an en­emy’s soul, as was scalp­ing. In re­cent times the eyes have been re­garded as the win­dows of the soul.

86:5.16Those who held the doc­trine of three or four souls be­lieved that the loss of one soul meant dis­com­fort, two ill­ness, three death. One soul lived in the breath, one in the head, one in the hair, one in the heart. The sick were ad­vised to stroll about in the open air with the hope of re­cap­tur­ing their strayed souls. The great­est of the med­i­cine men were sup­posed to ex­change the sick soul of a dis­eased per­son for a new one, the “new birth.”

86:5.17The chil­dren of Bado­nan de­vel­oped a be­lief in two souls, the breath and the shadow. The early Nod­ite races re­garded man as con­sist­ing of two per­sons, soul and body. This phi­los­o­phy of hu­man ex­is­tence was later re­flected in the Greek view­point. The Greeks them­selves be­lieved in three souls; the veg­e­ta­tive resided in the stom­ach, the an­i­mal in the heart, the in­tel­lec­tual in the head. The Es­ki­mos be­lieve that man has three parts: body, soul, and name.

87:2.3The fu­neral ser­vice orig­i­nated in man’s ef­fort to in­duce the ghost soul to de­part for its fu­ture home, and the fu­neral ser­mon was orig­i­nally de­signed to in­struct the new ghost how to get there. It was the cus­tom to pro­vide food and clothes for the ghost’s jour­ney, these ar­ti­cles be­ing placed in or near the grave. The sav­age be­lieved that it re­quired from three days to a year to “lay the ghost”—to get it away from the vicin­ity of the grave. The Es­ki­mos still be­lieve that the soul stays with the body three days.

89:5.4The taste for hu­man flesh grows. Hav­ing been started through hunger, friend­ship, re­venge, or re­li­gious rit­ual, the eat­ing of hu­man flesh goes on to ha­bit­ual can­ni­bal­ism. Man-eat­ing has arisen through food scarcity, though this has sel­dom been the un­der­ly­ing rea­son. The Es­ki­mos and early An­don­ites, how­ever, sel­dom were can­ni­bal­is­tic ex­cept in times of famine. The red men, es­pe­cially in Cen­tral Amer­ica, were can­ni­bals. It was once a gen­eral prac­tice for prim­i­tive moth­ers to kill and eat their own chil­dren in or­der to re­new the strength lost in child­bear­ing, and in Queens­land the first child is still fre­quently thus killed and de­voured. In re­cent times can­ni­bal­ism has been de­lib­er­ately re­sorted to by many African tribes as a war mea­sure, a sort of fright­ful­ness with which to ter­ror­ize their neigh­bors.

92:6.1Twen­ti­eth-cen­tury Uran­tia re­li­gions pre­sent an in­ter­est­ing study of the so­cial evo­lu­tion of man’s wor­ship im­pulse. Many faiths have pro­gressed very lit­tle since the days of the ghost cult. The Pyg­mies of Africa have no re­li­gious re­ac­tions as a class, al­though some of them be­lieve slightly in a spirit en­vi­ron­ment. They are to­day just where prim­i­tive man was when the evo­lu­tion of re­li­gion be­gan. The ba­sic be­lief of prim­i­tive re­li­gion was sur­vival af­ter death. The idea of wor­ship­ing a per­sonal God in­di­cates ad­vanced evo­lu­tion­ary de­vel­op­ment, even the first stage of rev­e­la­tion. The Dyaks have evolved only the most prim­i­tive re­li­gious prac­tices. The com­par­a­tively re­cent Es­ki­mos and Amerinds had very mea­ger con­cepts of God; they be­lieved in ghosts and had an in­def­i­nite idea of sur­vival of some sort af­ter death. Pres­ent-day na­tive Aus­tralians have only a ghost fear, dread of the dark, and a crude an­ces­tor ven­er­a­tion. The Zu­lus are just evolv­ing a re­li­gion of ghost fear and sac­ri­fice. Many African tribes, ex­cept through mis­sion­ary work of Chris­tians and Mo­hammedans, are not yet be­yond the fe­tish stage of re­li­gious evo­lu­tion. But some groups have long held to the idea of mono­the­ism, like the one­time Thra­cians, who also be­lieved in im­mor­tal­ity.

Onward

Cited alongside: Andonites, red race, Andites, children, Foxhall peoples, Nodites, Sangiks, soul