The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Read through

Chinese

44 paragraphs · about 16 minutes

Every paragraph the index cites under Chinese, once, in the order of the book. Beside each stand the entries that cite it.

45:4.86. Singlang­ton, the first of the yel­low men to teach and lead his peo­ple in the wor­ship of “One Truth” in­stead of many. Thou­sands of years ago the yel­low man knew of the one God.

64:6.143. The yel­low man. The prim­i­tive yel­low tribes were the first to aban­don the chase, es­tab­lish set­tled com­mu­ni­ties, and de­velop a home life based on agri­cul­ture. In­tel­lec­tu­ally they were some­what in­fe­rior to the red man, but so­cially and col­lec­tively they proved them­selves su­pe­rior to all of the San­gik peo­ples in the mat­ter of fos­ter­ing racial civ­i­liza­tion. Be­cause they de­vel­oped a fra­ter­nal spirit, the var­i­ous tribes learn­ing to live to­gether in rel­a­tive peace, they were able to drive the red race be­fore them as they grad­u­ally ex­panded into Asia.

64:6.15They trav­eled far from the in­flu­ences of the spir­i­tual head­quar­ters of the world and drifted into great dark­ness fol­low­ing the Cali­gas­tia apos­tasy; but there oc­curred one bril­liant age among this peo­ple when Singlang­ton, about one hun­dred thou­sand years ago, as­sumed the lead­er­ship of these tribes and pro­claimed the wor­ship of the “One Truth.”

64:6.16The sur­vival of com­par­a­tively large num­bers of the yel­low race is due to their in­ter­tribal peace­ful­ness. From the days of Singlang­ton to the times of mod­ern China, the yel­low race has been num­bered among the more peace­ful of the na­tions of Uran­tia. This race re­ceived a small but po­tent legacy of the later im­ported Adamic stock.

66:5.10The blue man was par­tial to al­pha­bet writ­ing and made the great­est prog­ress along such lines. The red man pre­ferred pic­to­rial writ­ing, while the yel­low races drifted into the use of sym­bols for words and ideas, much like those they now em­ploy. But the al­pha­bet and much more was sub­se­quently lost to the world dur­ing the con­fu­sion at­ten­dant upon re­bel­lion. The Cali­gas­tia de­fec­tion de­stroyed the hope of the world for a uni­ver­sal lan­guage, at least for un­told ages.

68:0.3So­cial evo­lu­tion of the co-op­er­a­tive or­der was ini­ti­ated by the Dala­ma­tia teach­ers, and for three hun­dred thou­sand years man­kind was nur­tured in the idea of group ac­tiv­i­ties. The blue man most of all prof­ited by these early so­cial teach­ings, the red man to some ex­tent, and the black man least of all. In more re­cent times the yel­low race and the white race have pre­sented the most ad­vanced so­cial de­vel­op­ment on Uran­tia.

68:4.3Ghost fear drove prim­i­tive man to en­vi­sion the super­nat­u­ral and thus se­curely laid the foun­da­tions for those pow­er­ful so­cial in­flu­ences of ethics and re­li­gion which in turn pre­served in­vi­o­late the mores and cus­toms of so­ci­ety from gen­er­a­tion to gen­er­a­tion. The one thing which early es­tab­lished and crys­tal­lized the mores was the be­lief that the dead were jeal­ous of the ways by which they had lived and died; there­fore would they visit dire pun­ish­ment upon those liv­ing mor­tals who dared to treat with care­less dis­dain the rules of liv­ing which they had hon­ored when in the flesh. All this is best il­lus­trated by the pres­ent rev­er­ence of the yel­low race for their an­ces­tors. Later de­vel­op­ing prim­i­tive re­li­gion greatly re­in­forced ghost fear in sta­bi­liz­ing the mores, but ad­vanc­ing civ­i­liza­tion has in­creas­ingly lib­er­ated man­kind from the bond­age of fear and the slav­ery of su­per­sti­tion.

79:5.1While the story of In­dia is that of And­ite con­quest and even­tual sub­mer­gence in the older evo­lu­tion­ary peo­ples, the nar­ra­tive of east­ern Asia is more prop­erly that of the pri­mary San­giks, par­tic­u­larly the red man and the yel­low man. These two races largely es­caped that ad­mix­ture with the de­based Ne­an­derthal strain which so greatly re­tarded the blue man in Eu­rope, thus pre­serv­ing the su­pe­rior po­ten­tial of the pri­mary San­gik type.

79:5.2While the early Ne­an­derthalers were spread out over the en­tire breadth of Eura­sia, the east­ern wing was the more con­tam­i­nated with de­based an­i­mal strains. These sub­hu­man types were pushed south by the fifth glacier, the same ice sheet which so long blocked San­gik mi­gra­tion into east­ern Asia. And when the red man moved north­east around the high­lands of In­dia, he found north­east­ern Asia free from these sub­hu­man types. The tribal or­ga­ni­za­tion of the red races was formed ear­lier than that of any other peo­ples, and they were the first to mi­grate from the cen­tral Asian fo­cus of the San­giks. The in­fe­rior Ne­an­derthal strains were de­stroyed or driven off the main­land by the later mi­grat­ing yel­low tribes. But the red man had reigned su­preme in east­ern Asia for al­most one hun­dred thou­sand years be­fore the yel­low tribes ar­rived.

79:5.3More than three hun­dred thou­sand years ago the main body of the yel­low race en­tered China from the south as coast­wise mi­grants. Each mil­len­nium they pen­e­trated far­ther and far­ther in­land, but they did not make con­tact with their mi­grat­ing Ti­betan breth­ren un­til com­par­a­tively re­cent times.

79:5.4Grow­ing pop­u­la­tion pres­sure caused the north­ward-mov­ing yel­low race to be­gin to push into the hunt­ing grounds of the red man. This en­croach­ment, cou­pled with nat­u­ral racial an­tag­o­nism, cul­mi­nated in in­creas­ing hos­til­i­ties, and thus be­gan the cru­cial strug­gle for the fer­tile lands of far­ther Asia.

79:5.5The story of this age­long con­test be­tween the red and yel­low races is an epic of Uran­tia his­tory. For over two hun­dred thou­sand years these two su­pe­rior races waged bit­ter and un­remit­ting war­fare. In the ear­lier strug­gles the red men were gen­er­ally suc­cess­ful, their raid­ing par­ties spread­ing havoc among the yel­low set­tle­ments. But the yel­low man was an apt pupil in the art of war­fare, and he early man­i­fested a marked abil­ity to live peace­ably with his com­pa­tri­ots; the Chi­nese were the first to learn that in union there is strength. The red tribes con­tin­ued their in­ternecine con­flicts, and pres­ently they be­gan to suf­fer re­peated de­feats at the ag­gres­sive hands of the re­lent­less Chi­nese, who con­tin­ued their in­ex­orable march north­ward.

79:5.6One hun­dred thou­sand years ago the dec­i­mated tribes of the red race were fight­ing with their backs to the re­treat­ing ice of the last glacier, and when the land pas­sage to the West, over the Bering isth­mus, be­came pass­able, these tribes were not slow in for­sak­ing the in­hos­pitable shores of the Asi­atic con­ti­nent. It is eighty-five thou­sand years since the last of the pure red men de­parted from Asia, but the long strug­gle left its ge­netic im­print upon the vic­to­ri­ous yel­low race. The north­ern Chi­nese peo­ples, to­gether with the An­don­ite Siberi­ans, as­sim­i­lated much of the red stock and were in con­sid­er­able mea­sure ben­e­fited thereby.

79:5.7The North Amer­i­can In­di­ans never came in con­tact with even the And­ite off­spring of Adam and Eve, hav­ing been dis­pos­sessed of their Asi­atic home­lands some fifty thou­sand years be­fore the com­ing of Adam. Dur­ing the age of And­ite mi­gra­tions the pure red strains were spread­ing out over North Amer­ica as no­madic tribes, hunters who prac­ticed agri­cul­ture to a small ex­tent. These races and cul­tural groups re­mained al­most com­pletely iso­lated from the re­main­der of the world from their ar­rival in the Amer­i­cas down to the end of the first mil­len­nium of the Chris­tian era, when they were dis­cov­ered by the white races of Eu­rope. Up to that time the Es­ki­mos were the near­est to white men the north­ern tribes of red men had ever seen.

79:5.8The red and the yel­low races are the only hu­man stocks that ever achieved a high de­gree of civ­i­liza­tion apart from the in­flu­ences of the And­ites. The old­est Amerindian cul­ture was the Ona­mo­na­lon­ton cen­ter in Cal­i­for­nia, but this had long since van­ished by 35,000 B.C. In Mex­ico, Cen­tral Amer­ica, and in the moun­tains of South Amer­ica the later and more en­dur­ing civ­i­liza­tions were founded by a race pre­dom­i­nantly red but con­tain­ing a con­sid­er­able ad­mix­ture of the yel­low, or­ange, and blue.

79:5.9These civ­i­liza­tions were evo­lu­tion­ary prod­ucts of the San­giks, not­with­stand­ing that traces of And­ite blood reached Peru. Ex­cept­ing the Es­ki­mos in North Amer­ica and a few Poly­ne­sian And­ites in South Amer­ica, the peo­ples of the West­ern Hemi­sphere had no con­tact with the rest of the world un­til the end of the first mil­len­nium af­ter Christ. In the orig­i­nal Mel­chiz­e­dek plan for the im­prove­ment of the Uran­tia races it had been stip­u­lated that one mil­lion of the pure-line de­scen­dants of Adam should go to up­step the red men of the Amer­i­cas.

79:6.4Like the peo­ples of In­dia and the Lev­ant, vic­to­ri­ous tribes of the yel­low man es­tab­lished their ear­li­est cen­ters along the coast and up the rivers. The coastal set­tle­ments fared poorly in later years as the in­creas­ing floods and the shift­ing courses of the rivers made the low­land cities un­ten­able.

79:6.5–6 · two paragraphs not cited here ·

79:6.5Twenty thou­sand years ago the an­ces­tors of the Chi­nese had built up a dozen strong cen­ters of prim­i­tive cul­ture and learn­ing, es­pe­cially along the Yel­low River and the Yangtze. And now these cen­ters be­gan to be re­in­forced by the ar­rival of a steady stream of su­pe­rior blended peo­ples from Sinkiang and Ti­bet. The mi­gra­tion from Ti­bet to the Yangtze val­ley was not so ex­ten­sive as in the north, nei­ther were the Ti­betan cen­ters so ad­vanced as those of the Tarim basin. But both move­ments car­ried a cer­tain amount of And­ite blood east­ward to the river set­tle­ments.

79:6.6The su­pe­ri­or­ity of the an­cient yel­low race was due to four great fac­tors:

79:6.71. Ge­netic. Un­like their blue cousins in Eu­rope, both the red and yel­low races had largely es­caped mix­ture with de­based hu­man stocks. The north­ern Chi­nese, al­ready strength­ened by small amounts of the su­pe­rior red and An­donic strains, were soon to ben­e­fit by a con­sid­er­able in­flux of And­ite blood. The south­ern Chi­nese did not fare so well in this re­gard, and they had long suf­fered from ab­sorp­tion of the green race, while later on they were to be fur­ther weak­ened by the in­fil­tra­tion of the swarms of in­fe­rior peo­ples crowded out of In­dia by the Dra­vid­ian-And­ite in­va­sion. And to­day in China there is a def­i­nite dif­fer­ence be­tween the north­ern and south­ern races.

79:6.82. So­cial. The yel­low race early learned the value of peace among them­selves. Their in­ter­nal peace­able­ness so con­tributed to pop­u­la­tion in­crease as to in­sure the spread of their civ­i­liza­tion among many mil­lions. From 25,000 to 5000 B.C. the high­est mass civ­i­liza­tion on Uran­tia was in cen­tral and north­ern China. The yel­low man was first to achieve a racial sol­i­dar­ity—the first to at­tain a large-scale cul­tural, so­cial, and po­lit­i­cal civ­i­liza­tion.

79:6.9The Chi­nese of 15,000 B.C. were ag­gres­sive mil­i­tarists; they had not been weak­ened by an over­rev­er­ence for the past, and num­ber­ing less than twelve mil­lion, they formed a com­pact body speak­ing a com­mon lan­guage. Dur­ing this age they built up a real na­tion, much more united and ho­mo­ge­neous than their po­lit­i­cal unions of his­toric times.

79:7.4The later waves of And­ites brought with them cer­tain of the cul­tural ad­vances of Mes­o­po­ta­mia; this is es­pe­cially true of the last waves of mi­gra­tion from the west. They greatly im­proved the eco­nomic and ed­u­ca­tional prac­tices of the north­ern Chi­nese; and while their in­flu­ence upon the re­li­gious cul­ture of the yel­low race was short-lived, their later de­scen­dants con­tributed much to a sub­se­quent spir­i­tual awak­en­ing. But the And­ite tra­di­tions of the beauty of Eden and Dala­ma­tia did in­flu­ence Chi­nese tra­di­tions; early Chi­nese leg­ends place “the land of the gods” in the west.

79:7.5The Chi­nese peo­ple did not be­gin to build cities and en­gage in man­u­fac­ture un­til af­ter 10,000 B.C., sub­se­quent to the cli­matic changes in Tur­kes­tan and the ar­rival of the later And­ite im­mi­grants. The in­fu­sion of this new blood did not add so much to the civ­i­liza­tion of the yel­low man as it stim­u­lated the fur­ther and rapid de­vel­op­ment of the la­tent ten­den­cies of the su­pe­rior Chi­nese stocks. From Ho­nan to Shensi the po­ten­tials of an ad­vanced civ­i­liza­tion were com­ing to fruit. Met­al­work­ing and all the arts of man­u­fac­ture date from these days.

79:8.1While the red man suf­fered from too much war­fare, it is not al­to­gether amiss to say that the de­vel­op­ment of state­hood among the Chi­nese was de­layed by the thor­ough­ness of their con­quest of Asia. They had a great po­ten­tial of racial sol­i­dar­ity, but it failed prop­erly to de­velop be­cause the con­tin­u­ous driv­ing stim­u­lus of the ever-pres­ent dan­ger of ex­ter­nal ag­gres­sion was lack­ing.

79:8.2With the com­ple­tion of the con­quest of east­ern Asia the an­cient mil­i­tary state grad­u­ally dis­in­te­grated—past wars were for­got­ten. Of the epic strug­gle with the red race there per­sisted only the hazy tra­di­tion of an an­cient con­test with the archer peo­ples. The Chi­nese early turned to ag­ri­cul­tural pur­suits, which con­tributed fur­ther to their pa­cific ten­den­cies, while a pop­u­la­tion well be­low the land-man ra­tio for agri­cul­ture still fur­ther con­tributed to the grow­ing peace­ful­ness of the coun­try.

79:8.3–4 · two paragraphs not cited here ·

79:8.3Con­scious­ness of past achieve­ments (some­what di­min­ished in the pres­ent), the con­ser­vatism of an over­whelm­ingly ag­ri­cul­tural peo­ple, and a well-de­vel­oped fam­ily life equaled the birth of an­ces­tor ven­er­a­tion, cul­mi­nat­ing in the cus­tom of so hon­or­ing the men of the past as to bor­der on wor­ship. A very sim­i­lar at­ti­tude pre­vailed among the white races in Eu­rope for some five hun­dred years fol­low­ing the dis­rup­tion of Greco-Ro­man civ­i­liza­tion.

79:8.4The be­lief in, and wor­ship of, the “One Truth” as taught by Singlang­ton never en­tirely died out; but as time passed, the search for new and higher truth be­came over­shad­owed by a grow­ing ten­dency to ven­er­ate that which was al­ready es­tab­lished. Slowly the ge­nius of the yel­low race be­came di­verted from the pur­suit of the un­known to the preser­va­tion of the known. And this is the rea­son for the stag­na­tion of what had been the world’s most rapidly pro­gress­ing civ­i­liza­tion.

79:8.5Be­tween 4000 and 500 B.C. the po­lit­i­cal re­uni­fi­ca­tion of the yel­low race was con­sum­mated, but the cul­tural union of the Yangtze and Yel­low river cen­ters had al­ready been ef­fected. This po­lit­i­cal re­uni­fi­ca­tion of the later tribal groups was not with­out con­flict, but the so­ci­etal opin­ion of war re­mained low; an­ces­tor wor­ship, in­creas­ing di­alects, and no call for mil­i­tary ac­tion for thou­sands upon thou­sands of years had ren­dered this peo­ple ul­tra­peace­ful.

79:8.6De­spite fail­ure to ful­fill the prom­ise of an early de­vel­op­ment of ad­vanced state­hood, the yel­low race did pro­gres­sively move for­ward in the re­al­iza­tion of the arts of civ­i­liza­tion, es­pe­cially in the realms of agri­cul­ture and hor­ti­cul­ture. The hy­draulic prob­lems faced by the agri­cul­tur­ists in Shensi and Ho­nan de­manded group co-op­er­a­tion for so­lu­tion. Such ir­ri­ga­tion and soil-con­ser­va­tion dif­fi­cul­ties con­tributed in no small mea­sure to the de­vel­op­ment of in­ter­de­pen­dence with the con­se­quent pro­mo­tion of peace among farm­ing groups.

79:8.7Soon de­vel­op­ments in writ­ing, to­gether with the es­tab­lish­ment of schools, con­tributed to the dis­sem­i­na­tion of knowl­edge on a pre­vi­ously un­equaled scale. But the cum­ber­some na­ture of the ideo­graphic writ­ing sys­tem placed a nu­mer­i­cal limit upon the learned classes de­spite the early ap­pear­ance of print­ing. And above all else, the pro­cess of so­cial stan­dard­iza­tion and re­li­gio-philo­sophic dogma­ti­za­tion con­tin­ued apace. The re­li­gious de­vel­op­ment of an­ces­tor ven­er­a­tion be­came fur­ther com­pli­cated by a flood of su­per­sti­tions in­volv­ing na­ture wor­ship, but lin­ger­ing ves­tiges of a real con­cept of God re­mained pre­served in the im­pe­rial wor­ship of Shang-ti.

79:8.8 · one paragraph not cited here ·

79:8.8The great weak­ness of an­ces­tor ven­er­a­tion is that it pro­motes a back­ward-look­ing phi­los­o­phy. How­ever wise it may be to glean wis­dom from the past, it is folly to re­gard the past as the ex­clu­sive source of truth. Truth is rel­a­tive and ex­pand­ing; it lives al­ways in the pres­ent, achiev­ing new ex­pres­sion in each gen­er­a­tion of men—even in each hu­man life.

79:8.9The great strength in a ven­er­a­tion of an­ces­try is the value that such an at­ti­tude places upon the fam­ily. The amaz­ing sta­bil­ity and per­sis­tence of Chi­nese cul­ture is a con­se­quence of the paramount po­si­tion ac­corded the fam­ily, for civ­i­liza­tion is di­rectly de­pen­dent on the ef­fec­tive func­tion­ing of the fam­ily; and in China the fam­ily at­tained a so­cial im­por­tance, even a re­li­gious sig­nif­i­cance, ap­proached by few other peo­ples.

79:8.10–15 · six paragraphs not cited here ·

79:8.10The fil­ial de­vo­tion and fam­ily loy­alty ex­acted by the grow­ing cult of an­ces­tor wor­ship in­sured the build­ing up of su­pe­rior fam­ily re­la­tion­ships and of en­dur­ing fam­ily groups, all of which fa­cil­i­tated the fol­low­ing fac­tors in the preser­va­tion of civ­i­liza­tion:

79:8.111. Con­ser­va­tion of prop­erty and wealth.

79:8.122. Pool­ing of the ex­pe­ri­ence of more than one gen­er­a­tion.

79:8.133. Ef­fi­cient ed­u­ca­tion of chil­dren in the arts and sci­ences of the past.

79:8.144. De­vel­op­ment of a strong sense of duty, the en­hance­ment of moral­ity, and the aug­men­ta­tion of eth­i­cal sen­si­tiv­ity.

79:8.15The for­ma­tive pe­riod of Chi­nese civ­i­liza­tion, open­ing with the com­ing of the And­ites, con­tin­ues on down to the great eth­i­cal, moral, and semire­li­gious awak­en­ing of the sixth cen­tury be­fore Christ. And Chi­nese tra­di­tion pre­serves the hazy rec­ord of the evo­lu­tion­ary past; the tran­si­tion from mother- to fa­ther-fam­ily, the es­tab­lish­ment of agri­cul­ture, the de­vel­op­ment of ar­chi­tec­ture, the ini­ti­a­tion of in­dus­try—all these are suc­ces­sively nar­rated. And this story pre­sents, with greater ac­cu­racy than any other sim­i­lar ac­count, the pic­ture of the mag­nif­i­cent as­cent of a su­pe­rior peo­ple from the lev­els of bar­barism. Dur­ing this time they passed from a prim­i­tive ag­ri­cul­tural so­ci­ety to a higher so­cial or­ga­ni­za­tion em­brac­ing cities, man­u­fac­ture, met­al­work­ing, com­mer­cial ex­change, gov­ern­ment, writ­ing, math­e­mat­ics, art, sci­ence, and print­ing.

79:8.16And so the an­cient civ­i­liza­tion of the yel­low race has per­sisted down through the cen­turies. It is al­most forty thou­sand years since the first im­por­tant ad­vances were made in Chi­nese cul­ture, and though there have been many ret­ro­gres­sions, the civ­i­liza­tion of the sons of Han comes the near­est of all to pre­sent­ing an un­bro­ken pic­ture of con­tin­ual pro­gres­sion right on down to the times of the twen­ti­eth cen­tury. The me­chan­i­cal and re­li­gious de­vel­op­ments of the white races have been of a high or­der, but they have never ex­celled the Chi­nese in fam­ily loy­alty, group ethics, or per­sonal moral­ity.

79:8.17This an­cient cul­ture has con­tributed much to hu­man hap­pi­ness; mil­lions of hu­man be­ings have lived and died, blessed by its achieve­ments. For cen­turies this great civ­i­liza­tion has rested upon the lau­rels of the past, but it is even now reawak­en­ing to en­vi­sion anew the tran­scen­dent goals of mor­tal ex­is­tence, once again to take up the un­remit­ting strug­gle for never-end­ing prog­ress.

81:1.6The evo­lu­tion­ary peo­ples (no­tably the Chi­nese) early learned to plant seeds and to cul­ti­vate crops through ob­ser­va­tion of the sprout­ing of seeds ac­ci­den­tally moist­ened or which had been put in graves as food for the de­parted. But through­out south­west Asia, along the fer­tile river bot­toms and ad­ja­cent plains, the And­ites were car­ry­ing out the im­proved ag­ri­cul­tural tech­niques in­her­ited from their an­ces­tors, who had made farm­ing and gar­den­ing the chief pur­suits within the bound­aries of the sec­ond gar­den.

81:2.12The And­ites of Tur­kes­tan were the first peo­ples to ex­ten­sively do­mes­ti­cate the horse, and this is an­other rea­son why their cul­ture was for so long pre­dom­i­nant. By 5000 B.C. the Mes­o­po­ta­mian, Tur­kes­tan, and Chi­nese farm­ers had be­gun the rais­ing of sheep, goats, cows, camels, horses, fowls, and ele­phants. They em­ployed as beasts of bur­den the ox, camel, horse, and yak. Man was him­self at one time the beast of bur­den. One ruler of the blue race once had one hun­dred thou­sand men in his colony of bur­den bear­ers.

84:5.6The early Chi­nese and the Greeks treated women bet­ter than did most sur­round­ing peo­ples. But the He­brews were ex­ceed­ingly dis­trust­ful of them. In the Oc­ci­dent woman has had a dif­fi­cult climb un­der the Pauline doc­trines which be­came at­tached to Chris­tian­ity, al­though Chris­tian­ity did ad­vance the mores by im­pos­ing more strin­gent sex obli­ga­tions upon man. Woman’s es­tate is lit­tle short of hope­less un­der the pe­cu­liar degra­da­tion which at­taches to her in Mo­hammedanism, and she fares even worse un­der the teach­ings of sev­eral other Ori­en­tal re­li­gions.

84:7.1Sex mat­ing is in­stinc­tive, chil­dren are the nat­u­ral re­sult, and the fam­ily thus au­to­mat­i­cally comes into ex­is­tence. As are the fam­i­lies of the race or na­tion, so is its so­ci­ety. If the fam­i­lies are good, the so­ci­ety is like­wise good. The great cul­tural sta­bil­ity of the Jew­ish and of the Chi­nese peo­ples lies in the strength of their fam­ily groups.

84:7.2–20 · 19 paragraphs not cited here ·

84:7.2Woman’s in­stinct to love and care for chil­dren con­spired to make her the in­ter­ested party in pro­mot­ing mar­riage and prim­i­tive fam­ily life. Man was only forced into home build­ing by the pres­sure of the later mores and so­cial con­ven­tions; he was slow to take an in­ter­est in the es­tab­lish­ment of mar­riage and home be­cause the sex act im­poses no bi­o­logic con­se­quences upon him.

84:7.3Sex as­so­ci­a­tion is nat­u­ral, but mar­riage is so­cial and has al­ways been reg­u­lated by the mores. The mores (re­li­gious, moral, and eth­i­cal), to­gether with prop­erty, pride, and chivalry, sta­bi­lize the in­sti­tu­tions of mar­riage and fam­ily. When­ever the mores fluc­tu­ate, there is fluc­tu­a­tion in the sta­bil­ity of the home-mar­riage in­sti­tu­tion. Mar­riage is now pass­ing out of the prop­erty stage into the per­sonal era. For­merly man pro­tected woman be­cause she was his chat­tel, and she obeyed for the same rea­son. Re­gard­less of its mer­its this sys­tem did pro­vide sta­bil­ity. Now, woman is no longer re­garded as prop­erty, and new mores are emerg­ing de­signed to sta­bi­lize the mar­riage-home in­sti­tu­tion:

84:7.41. The new role of re­li­gion—the teach­ing that pa­ren­tal ex­pe­ri­ence is es­sen­tial, the idea of pro­cre­at­ing cos­mic cit­i­zens, the en­larged un­der­stand­ing of the priv­i­lege of pro­cre­ation—giv­ing sons to the Fa­ther.

84:7.52. The new role of sci­ence—pro­cre­ation is be­com­ing more and more vol­un­tary, sub­ject to man’s con­trol. In an­cient times lack of un­der­stand­ing in­sured the ap­pear­ance of chil­dren in the ab­sence of all de­sire there­for.

84:7.63. The new func­tion of plea­sure lures—this in­tro­duces a new fac­tor into racial sur­vival; an­cient man ex­posed un­de­sired chil­dren to die; mod­erns refuse to bear them.

84:7.74. The en­hance­ment of pa­ren­tal in­stinct—each gen­er­a­tion now tends to elim­i­nate from the re­pro­duc­tive stream of the race those in­di­vid­u­als in whom pa­ren­tal in­stinct is in­suf­fi­ciently strong to in­sure the pro­cre­ation of chil­dren, the prospec­tive par­ents of the next gen­er­a­tion.

84:7.8But the home as an in­sti­tu­tion, a part­ner­ship be­tween one man and one woman, dates more specif­i­cally from the days of Dala­ma­tia, about one-half mil­lion years ago, the monog­a­mous prac­tices of An­don and his im­me­di­ate de­scen­dants hav­ing been aban­doned long be­fore. Fam­ily life, how­ever, was not much to boast of be­fore the days of the Nod­ites and the later Adamites. Adam and Eve ex­erted a last­ing in­flu­ence on all man­kind; for the first time in the his­tory of the world men and women were ob­served work­ing side by side in the Gar­den. The Edenic ideal, the whole fam­ily as gar­den­ers, was a new idea on Uran­tia.

84:7.9The early fam­ily em­braced a re­lated work­ing group, in­clud­ing the slaves, all liv­ing in one dwell­ing. Mar­riage and fam­ily life have not al­ways been iden­ti­cal but have of ne­ces­sity been closely as­so­ci­ated. Woman al­ways wanted the in­di­vid­ual fam­ily, and even­tu­ally she had her way.

84:7.10Love of off­spring is al­most uni­ver­sal and is of dis­tinct sur­vival value. The an­cients al­ways sac­ri­ficed the mother’s in­ter­ests for the wel­fare of the child; an Es­kimo mother even yet licks her baby in lieu of wash­ing. But prim­i­tive moth­ers only nour­ished and cared for their chil­dren when very young; like the an­i­mals, they dis­carded them as soon as they grew up. En­dur­ing and con­tin­u­ous hu­man as­so­ci­a­tions have never been founded on bi­o­logic af­fec­tion alone. The an­i­mals love their chil­dren; man—civ­i­lized man—loves his chil­dren’s chil­dren. The higher the civ­i­liza­tion, the greater the joy of par­ents in the chil­dren’s ad­vance­ment and suc­cess; thus the new and higher re­al­iza­tion of name pride comes into ex­is­tence.

84:7.11The large fam­i­lies among an­cient peo­ples were not nec­es­sar­ily af­fec­tional. Many chil­dren were de­sired be­cause:

84:7.121. They were valu­able as la­bor­ers.

84:7.132. They were old-age in­sur­ance.

84:7.143. Daugh­ters were sal­able.

84:7.154. Fam­ily pride re­quired ex­ten­sion of name.

84:7.165. Sons af­forded pro­tec­tion and de­fense.

84:7.176. Ghost fear pro­duced a dread of be­ing alone.

84:7.187. Cer­tain re­li­gions re­quired off­spring.

84:7.19An­ces­tor wor­shipers view the fail­ure to have sons as the su­preme calamity for all time and eter­nity. They de­sire above all else to have sons to of­fi­ci­ate in the post-mortem feasts, to of­fer the re­quired sac­ri­fices for the ghost’s prog­ress through spir­it­land.

84:7.20Among an­cient sav­ages, dis­ci­pline of chil­dren was be­gun very early; and the child early re­al­ized that dis­obe­di­ence meant fail­ure or even death just as it did to the an­i­mals. It is civ­i­liza­tion’s pro­tec­tion of the child from the nat­u­ral con­se­quences of fool­ish con­duct that con­tributes so much to mod­ern in­sub­or­di­na­tion.

84:7.21Es­kimo chil­dren thrive on so lit­tle dis­ci­pline and cor­rec­tion sim­ply be­cause they are nat­u­rally docile lit­tle an­i­mals; the chil­dren of both the red and the yel­low men are al­most equally tractable. But in races con­tain­ing And­ite in­her­i­tance, chil­dren are not so placid; these more imag­i­na­tive and ad­ven­tur­ous youths re­quire more train­ing and dis­ci­pline. Mod­ern prob­lems of child cul­ture are ren­dered in­creas­ingly dif­fi­cult by:

85:3.3The He­brews wor­shiped ser­pents down to the days of King Hezekiah, and the Hin­dus still main­tain friendly re­la­tions with their house snakes. The Chi­nese wor­ship of the dragon is a sur­vival of the snake cults. The wis­dom of the ser­pent was a sym­bol of Greek med­i­cine and is still em­ployed as an em­blem by mod­ern physi­cians. The art of snake charm­ing has been handed down from the days of the fe­male shamans of the snake love cult, who, as the re­sult of daily snake bites, be­came im­mune, in fact, be­came gen­uine venom ad­dicts and could not get along with­out this poi­son.

86:4.8Al­most ev­ery group had a dif­fer­ent idea re­gard­ing the des­tiny of the ghost soul. The Greeks be­lieved that weak men must have weak souls; so they in­vented Hades as a fit place for the re­cep­tion of such ane­mic souls; these un­ro­bust spec­i­mens were also sup­posed to have shorter shad­ows. The early And­ites thought their ghosts re­turned to the an­ces­tral home­lands. The Chi­nese and Egyp­tians once be­lieved that soul and body re­mained to­gether. Among the Egyp­tians this led to care­ful tomb con­struc­tion and ef­forts at body preser­va­tion. Even mod­ern peo­ples seek to ar­rest the de­cay of the dead. The He­brews con­ceived that a phan­tom replica of the in­di­vid­ual went down to Sheol; it could not re­turn to the land of the liv­ing. They did make that im­por­tant ad­vance in the doc­trine of the evo­lu­tion of the soul.

89:6.4In olden times, when a new build­ing of any im­por­tance was started, it was cus­tom­ary to slay a hu­man be­ing as a “foun­da­tion sac­ri­fice.” This pro­vided a ghost spirit to watch over and pro­tect the struc­ture. When the Chi­nese made ready to cast a bell, cus­tom de­creed the sac­ri­fice of at least one maiden for the pur­pose of im­prov­ing the tone of the bell; the girl cho­sen was thrown alive into the molten metal.

90:2.8The Greeks be­lieved in the ef­fi­cacy of orac­u­lar ad­vice, the Chi­nese used magic as pro­tec­tion against demons, shaman­ism flour­ished in In­dia, and it still openly per­sists in cen­tral Asia. It is an only re­cently aban­doned prac­tice through­out much of the world.

90:3.84. Sin—pun­ish­ment for taboo vi­o­la­tion. In com­par­a­tively re­cent times it has been be­lieved that sick­ness is a pun­ish­ment for sin, per­sonal or racial. Among peo­ples travers­ing this level of evo­lu­tion the pre­vail­ing the­ory is that one can­not be af­flicted un­less one has vi­o­lated a taboo. To re­gard sick­ness and suf­fer­ing as “ar­rows of the Al­mighty within them” is typ­i­cal of such be­liefs. The Chi­nese and Mes­o­po­ta­mi­ans long re­garded dis­ease as the re­sult of the ac­tion of evil demons, al­though the Chaldeans also looked upon the stars as the cause of suf­fer­ing. This the­ory of dis­ease as a con­se­quence of di­vine wrath is still preva­lent among many re­put­edly civ­i­lized groups of Uran­tians.

94:5.7In China all of these be­liefs were later con­fused and com­pounded with the ever-grow­ing cult of an­ces­tor wor­ship. But never since the time of Singlang­ton have the Chi­nese fallen into help­less slav­ery to priestcraft. The yel­low race was the first to emerge from bar­baric bond­age into or­derly civ­i­liza­tion be­cause it was the first to achieve some mea­sure of free­dom from the ab­ject fear of the gods, not even fear­ing the ghosts of the dead as other races feared them. China met her de­feat be­cause she failed to pro­gress be­yond her early eman­ci­pa­tion from priests; she fell into an al­most equally calami­tous er­ror, the wor­ship of an­ces­tors.

94:6.12Like many other spir­i­tual and moral teach­ers, both Con­fu­cius and Lao-tse were even­tu­ally de­i­fied by their fol­low­ers in those spir­i­tu­ally dark ages of China which in­ter­vened be­tween the de­cline and per­ver­sion of the Taoist faith and the com­ing of the Bud­dhist mis­sion­ar­ies from In­dia. Dur­ing these spir­i­tu­ally deca­dent cen­turies the re­li­gion of the yel­low race de­gen­er­ated into a piti­ful the­ol­ogy wherein swarmed dev­ils, drag­ons, and evil spir­its, all be­to­ken­ing the re­turn­ing fears of the un­en­light­ened mor­tal mind. And China, once at the head of hu­man so­ci­ety be­cause of an ad­vanced re­li­gion, then fell be­hind be­cause of tem­po­rary fail­ure to pro­gress in the true path of the de­vel­op­ment of that God-con­scious­ness which is in­dis­pens­able to the true prog­ress, not only of the in­di­vid­ual mor­tal, but also of the in­tri­cate and com­plex civ­i­liza­tions which char­ac­ter­ize the ad­vance of cul­ture and so­ci­ety on an evo­lu­tion­ary planet of time and space.

111:0.4In the con­cep­tion of the at­man the Hindu teach­ers re­ally ap­prox­i­mated an ap­pre­ci­a­tion of the na­ture and pres­ence of the Ad­juster, but they failed to dis­tin­guish the co­p­res­ence of the evolv­ing and po­ten­tially im­mor­tal soul. The Chi­nese, how­ever, rec­og­nized two as­pects of a hu­man be­ing, the yang and the yin, the soul and the spirit. The Egyp­tians and many African tribes also be­lieved in two fac­tors, the ka and the ba; the soul was not usu­ally be­lieved to be pre-ex­is­tent, only the spirit.

133:4.9Je­sus had many vis­its with a Chi­nese mer­chant. In say­ing good-bye, he ad­mon­ished him: “Wor­ship only God, who is your true spirit an­ces­tor. Re­mem­ber that the Fa­ther’s spirit ever lives within you and al­ways points your soul-di­rec­tion heav­en­ward. If you fol­low the un­con­scious lead­ings of this im­mor­tal spirit, you are cer­tain to con­tinue on in the up­lifted way of find­ing God. And when you do at­tain the Fa­ther in heaven, it will be be­cause by seek­ing him you have be­come more and more like him. And so farewell, Chang, but only for a sea­son, for we shall meet again in the worlds of light where the Fa­ther of spirit souls has pro­vided many de­light­ful stop­ping-places for those who are Par­a­dise-bound.”

Onward

See also China; yellow race

Cited alongside: yellow race, red race, God, ancestor worship, civilization, blue race, China, Jews (ancient Hebrews)