The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Read through

apes

5 paragraphs · about 2 minutes · 2 chapters

The paragraphs in the index’s own groups, a chapter to each, in the order the index prints them, and in the order of the book within each. A paragraph read in an earlier chapter is named in one line.

apes its own citations 1 paragraph

88:1.5When an­i­mals be­came fe­tishes, there en­sued the taboos on eat­ing the flesh of the fe­tish an­i­mal. Apes and mon­keys, be­cause of re­sem­blance to man, early be­came fe­tish an­i­mals; later, snakes, birds, and swine were also sim­i­larly re­garded. At one time the cow was a fe­tish, the milk be­ing taboo while the exc­reta were highly es­teemed. The ser­pent was revered in Pales­tine, es­pe­cially by the Phoeni­cians, who, along with the Jews, con­sid­ered it to be the mouth­piece of evil spir­its. Even many mod­erns be­lieve in the charm pow­ers of rep­tiles. From Ara­bia on through In­dia to the snake dance of the Mo­qui tribe of red men the ser­pent has been revered.

man not descended from 4 paragraphs

62:1.1The early lemurs con­cerned in the an­ces­try of the hu­man species were not di­rectly re­lated to the pre-ex­is­tent tribes of gib­bons and apes then liv­ing in Eura­sia and north­ern Africa, whose progeny have sur­vived to the pres­ent time. Nei­ther were they the off­spring of the mod­ern type of lemur, though spring­ing from an an­ces­tor com­mon to both but long since ex­tinct.

62:3.11Con­tem­po­ra­ne­ously with the birth of these Pri­mates twins, an­other cou­ple—a pe­cu­liarly re­tarded male and fe­male of the mid-mam­mal tribe, a cou­ple that were both men­tally and phys­i­cally in­fe­rior—also gave birth to twins. These twins, one male and one fe­male, were in­dif­fer­ent to con­quest; they were con­cerned only with ob­tain­ing food and, since they would not eat flesh, soon lost all in­ter­est in seek­ing prey. These re­tarded twins be­came the found­ers of the mod­ern simian tribes. Their de­scen­dants sought the warmer south­ern re­gions with their mild cli­mates and an abun­dance of trop­i­cal fruits, where they have con­tin­ued much as of that day ex­cept for those branches which mated with the ear­lier types of gib­bons and apes and have greatly de­te­ri­o­rated in con­se­quence.

62:3.12And so it may be read­ily seen that man and the ape are re­lated only in that they sprang from the mid-mam­mals, a tribe in which there oc­curred the con­tem­po­ra­ne­ous birth and sub­se­quent seg­re­ga­tion of two pairs of twins: the in­fe­rior pair des­tined to pro­duce the mod­ern types of mon­key, ba­boon, chim­panzee, and go­rilla; the su­pe­rior pair des­tined to con­tinue the line of as­cent which evolved into man him­self.

62:3.13Mod­ern man and the simi­ans did spring from the same tribe and species but not from the same par­ents. Man’s an­ces­tors are de­scended from the su­pe­rior strains of the se­lected rem­nant of this mid-mam­mal tribe, whereas the mod­ern simi­ans (ex­cept­ing cer­tain pre-ex­is­tent types of lemurs, gib­bons, apes, and other mon­key­like crea­tures) are the de­scen­dants of the most in­fe­rior cou­ple of this mid-mam­mal group, a cou­ple who only sur­vived by hid­ing them­selves in a sub­ter­ranean food-stor­age re­treat for more than two weeks dur­ing the last fierce bat­tle of their tribe, emerg­ing only af­ter the hos­til­i­ties were well over.

Onward

See also simians

Cited alongside: simians, mortals, monkeys