The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 99

The Social Problems of Religion

Melchizedek

4. Transition Difficulties

99:4.1Gen­uine re­li­gion ren­ders the re­li­gion­ist so­cially fra­grant and cre­ates in­sights into hu­man fel­low­ship. But the for­mal­iza­tion of re­li­gious groups many times de­stroys the very val­ues for the pro­mo­tion of which the group was or­ga­nized. Hu­man friend­ship and di­vine re­li­gion are mu­tu­ally help­ful and sig­nif­i­cantly il­lu­mi­nat­ing if the growth in each is equal­ized and har­mo­nized. Re­li­gion puts new mean­ing into all group as­so­ci­a­tions—fam­i­lies, schools, and clubs. It im­parts new val­ues to play and ex­alts all true hu­mor.

99:4.2So­cial lead­er­ship is trans­formed by spir­i­tual in­sight; re­li­gion pre­vents all col­lec­tive move­ments from los­ing sight of their true ob­jec­tives. To­gether with chil­dren, re­li­gion is the great uni­fier of fam­ily life, pro­vided it is a liv­ing and grow­ing faith. Fam­ily life can­not be had with­out chil­dren; it can be lived with­out re­li­gion, but such a hand­i­cap enor­mously mul­ti­plies the dif­fi­cul­ties of this in­ti­mate hu­man as­so­ci­a­tion. Dur­ing the early decades of the twen­ti­eth cen­tury, fam­ily life, next to per­sonal re­li­gious ex­pe­ri­ence, suf­fers most from the deca­dence con­se­quent upon the tran­si­tion from old re­li­gious loy­al­ties to the emerg­ing new mean­ings and val­ues.

99:4.3True re­li­gion is a mean­ing­ful way of liv­ing dy­nam­i­cally face to face with the com­mon­place re­al­i­ties of ev­ery­day life. But if re­li­gion is to stim­u­late in­di­vid­ual de­vel­op­ment of char­ac­ter and aug­ment in­te­gra­tion of per­son­al­ity, it must not be stan­dard­ized. If it is to stim­u­late eval­u­a­tion of ex­pe­ri­ence and serve as a value-lure, it must not be stereo­typed. If re­li­gion is to pro­mote su­preme loy­al­ties, it must not be for­mal­ized.

99:4.4No mat­ter what up­heavals may at­tend the so­cial and eco­nomic growth of civ­i­liza­tion, re­li­gion is gen­uine and worth while if it fos­ters in the in­di­vid­ual an ex­pe­ri­ence in which the sov­er­eignty of truth, beauty, and good­ness pre­vails, for such is the true spir­i­tual con­cept of su­preme re­al­ity. And through love and wor­ship this be­comes mean­ing­ful as fel­low­ship with man and son­ship with God.

99:4.5Af­ter all, it is what one be­lieves rather than what one knows that de­ter­mines con­duct and dom­i­nates per­sonal per­for­mances. Purely fac­tual knowl­edge ex­erts very lit­tle in­flu­ence upon the av­er­age man un­less it be­comes emo­tion­ally ac­ti­vated. But the ac­ti­va­tion of re­li­gion is super­emo­tional, uni­fy­ing the en­tire hu­man ex­pe­ri­ence on tran­scen­dent lev­els through con­tact with, and re­lease of, spir­i­tual en­er­gies in the mor­tal life.

99:4.6Dur­ing the psy­cho­log­i­cally un­set­tled times of the twen­ti­eth cen­tury, amid the eco­nomic up­heavals, the moral cross­cur­rents, and the so­ci­o­logic rip tides of the cy­clonic tran­si­tions of a sci­en­tific era, thou­sands upon thou­sands of men and women have be­come hu­manly dis­lo­cated; they are anx­ious, rest­less, fear­ful, un­cer­tain, and un­set­tled; as never be­fore in the world’s his­tory they need the con­so­la­tion and sta­bi­liza­tion of sound re­li­gion. In the face of un­prece­dented sci­en­tific achieve­ment and me­chan­i­cal de­vel­op­ment there is spir­i­tual stag­na­tion and philo­sophic chaos.

99:4.7There is no dan­ger in re­li­gion’s be­com­ing more and more of a pri­vate mat­ter—a per­sonal ex­pe­ri­ence—pro­vided it does not lose its mo­ti­va­tion for un­selfish and lov­ing so­cial ser­vice. Re­li­gion has suf­fered from many sec­ondary in­flu­ences: sud­den mix­ing of cul­tures, in­ter­min­gling of creeds, diminu­tion of ec­cle­si­as­ti­cal au­thor­ity, chang­ing of fam­ily life, to­gether with ur­ban­iza­tion and mech­a­niza­tion.

99:4.8Man’s great­est spir­i­tual jeop­ardy con­sists in par­tial prog­ress, the predica­ment of un­fin­ished growth: for­sak­ing the evo­lu­tion­ary re­li­gions of fear with­out im­me­di­ately grasp­ing the rev­e­la­tory re­li­gion of love. Mod­ern sci­ence, par­tic­u­larly psy­chol­ogy, has weak­ened only those re­li­gions which are so largely de­pen­dent upon fear, su­per­sti­tion, and emo­tion.

99:4.9Tran­si­tion is al­ways ac­com­pa­nied by con­fu­sion, and there will be lit­tle tran­quil­lity in the re­li­gious world un­til the great strug­gle be­tween the three con­tend­ing philoso­phies of re­li­gion is ended:

99:4.101. The spiri­tis­tic be­lief (in a prov­i­den­tial De­ity) of many re­li­gions.

99:4.112. The hu­man­is­tic and ide­al­is­tic be­lief of many philoso­phies.

99:4.123. The mech­a­nis­tic and nat­u­ral­is­tic con­cep­tions of many sci­ences.

99:4.13And these three par­tial ap­proaches to the re­al­ity of the cos­mos must even­tu­ally be­come har­mo­nized by the rev­e­la­tory pre­sen­ta­tion of re­li­gion, phi­los­o­phy, and cos­mol­ogy which por­trays the tri­une ex­is­tence of spirit, mind, and en­ergy pro­ceed­ing from the Trin­ity of Par­a­dise and at­tain­ing time-space uni­fi­ca­tion within the De­ity of the Su­preme.