The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 99

The Social Problems of Religion

Melchizedek

2. Weakness of Institutional Religion

99:2.1In­sti­tu­tional re­li­gion can­not af­ford in­spi­ra­tion and pro­vide lead­er­ship in this im­pend­ing world-wide so­cial re­con­struc­tion and eco­nomic re­or­ga­ni­za­tion be­cause it has un­for­tu­nately be­come more or less of an or­ganic part of the so­cial or­der and the eco­nomic sys­tem which is des­tined to un­dergo re­con­struc­tion. Only the real re­li­gion of per­sonal spir­i­tual ex­pe­ri­ence can func­tion help­fully and cre­atively in the pres­ent cri­sis of civ­i­liza­tion.

99:2.2In­sti­tu­tional re­li­gion is now caught in the stale­mate of a vi­cious cir­cle. It can­not re­con­struct so­ci­ety with­out first re­con­struct­ing it­self; and be­ing so much an in­te­gral part of the es­tab­lished or­der, it can­not re­con­struct it­self un­til so­ci­ety has been rad­i­cally re­con­structed.

99:2.3Re­li­gion­ists must func­tion in so­ci­ety, in in­dus­try, and in pol­i­tics as in­di­vid­u­als, not as groups, par­ties, or in­sti­tu­tions. A re­li­gious group which pre­sumes to func­tion as such, apart from re­li­gious ac­tiv­i­ties, im­me­di­ately be­comes a po­lit­i­cal party, an eco­nomic or­ga­ni­za­tion, or a so­cial in­sti­tu­tion. Re­li­gious col­lec­tivism must con­fine its ef­forts to the fur­ther­ance of re­li­gious causes.

99:2.4Re­li­gion­ists are of no more value in the tasks of so­cial re­con­struc­tion than non­re­li­gion­ists ex­cept in so far as their re­li­gion has con­ferred upon them en­hanced cos­mic fore­sight and en­dowed them with that su­pe­rior so­cial wis­dom which is born of the sin­cere de­sire to love God su­premely and to love ev­ery man as a brother in the heav­enly king­dom. An ideal so­cial or­der is that in which ev­ery man loves his neigh­bor as he loves him­self.

99:2.5The in­sti­tu­tion­al­ized church may have ap­peared to serve so­ci­ety in the past by glo­ri­fy­ing the es­tab­lished po­lit­i­cal and eco­nomic or­ders, but it must speed­ily cease such ac­tion if it is to sur­vive. Its only proper at­ti­tude con­sists in the teach­ing of non­vi­o­lence, the doc­trine of peace­ful evo­lu­tion in the place of vi­o­lent rev­o­lu­tion—peace on earth and good will among all men.

99:2.6Mod­ern re­li­gion finds it dif­fi­cult to ad­just its at­ti­tude to­ward the rapidly shift­ing so­cial changes only be­cause it has per­mit­ted it­self to be­come so thor­oughly tra­di­tion­al­ized, dog­ma­tized, and in­sti­tu­tion­al­ized. The re­li­gion of liv­ing ex­pe­ri­ence finds no dif­fi­culty in keep­ing ahead of all these so­cial de­vel­op­ments and eco­nomic up­heavals, amid which it ever func­tions as a moral sta­bi­lizer, so­cial guide, and spir­i­tual pi­lot. True re­li­gion car­ries over from one age to an­other the worth-while cul­ture and that wis­dom which is born of the ex­pe­ri­ence of know­ing God and striv­ing to be like him.