The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 96

Yahweh—God of the Hebrews

Melchizedek

1. Deity Concepts Among the Semites

96:1.1The early Semites re­garded ev­ery­thing as be­ing in­dwelt by a spirit. There were spir­its of the an­i­mal and veg­etable worlds; an­nual spir­its, the lord of progeny; spir­its of fire, wa­ter, and air; a ver­i­ta­ble pan­theon of spir­its to be feared and wor­shiped. And the teach­ing of Mel­chiz­e­dek re­gard­ing a Uni­ver­sal Cre­ator never fully de­stroyed the be­lief in these sub­or­di­nate spir­its or na­ture gods.

96:1.2The prog­ress of the He­brews from poly­the­ism through heno­the­ism to mono­the­ism was not an un­bro­ken and con­tin­u­ous con­cep­tual de­vel­op­ment. They ex­pe­ri­enced many ret­ro­gres­sions in the evo­lu­tion of their De­ity con­cepts, while dur­ing any one epoch there ex­isted vary­ing ideas of God among dif­fer­ent groups of Semite be­liev­ers. From time to time nu­mer­ous terms were ap­plied to their con­cepts of God, and in or­der to pre­vent con­fu­sion these var­i­ous De­ity ti­tles will be de­fined as they per­tain to the evo­lu­tion of Jew­ish the­ol­ogy:

96:1.31. Yah­weh was the god of the south­ern Pales­tinian tribes, who as­so­ci­ated this con­cept of de­ity with Mount Ho­reb, the Sinai vol­cano. Yah­weh was merely one of the hun­dreds and thou­sands of na­ture gods which held the at­ten­tion and claimed the wor­ship of the Semitic tribes and peo­ples.

96:1.42. El Elyon. For cen­turies af­ter Mel­chiz­e­dek’s so­journ at Salem his doc­trine of De­ity per­sisted in var­i­ous ver­sions but was gen­er­ally con­noted by the term El Elyon, the Most High God of heaven. Many Semites, in­clud­ing the im­me­di­ate de­scen­dants of Abra­ham, at var­i­ous times wor­shiped both Yah­weh and El Elyon.

96:1.53. El Shad­dai. It is dif­fi­cult to ex­plain what El Shad­dai stood for. This idea of God was a com­pos­ite de­rived from the teach­ings of Amen­emope’s Book of Wis­dom mod­i­fied by Ikh­na­ton’s doc­trine of Aton and fur­ther in­flu­enced by Mel­chiz­e­dek’s teach­ings em­bod­ied in the con­cept of El Elyon. But as the con­cept of El Shad­dai per­me­ated the He­brew mind, it be­came thor­oughly col­ored with the Yah­weh be­liefs of the desert.

96:1.6One of the dom­i­nant ideas of the re­li­gion of this era was the Egyp­tian con­cept of di­vine Prov­i­dence, the teach­ing that ma­te­rial pros­per­ity was a re­ward for serv­ing El Shad­dai.

96:1.74. El. Amid all this con­fu­sion of ter­mi­nol­ogy and hazi­ness of con­cept, many de­vout be­liev­ers sin­cerely en­deav­ored to wor­ship all of these evolv­ing ideas of di­vin­ity, and there grew up the prac­tice of re­fer­ring to this com­pos­ite De­ity as El. And this term in­cluded still other of the Bed­ouin na­ture gods.

96:1.85. Elo­him. In Kish and Ur there long per­sisted Sume­rian-Chaldean groups who taught a three-in-one God con­cept founded on the tra­di­tions of the days of Adam and Mel­chiz­e­dek. This doc­trine was car­ried to Egypt, where this Trin­ity was wor­shiped un­der the name of Elo­him, or in the sin­gu­lar as Eloah. The philo­sophic cir­cles of Egypt and later Alexan­drian teach­ers of He­braic ex­trac­tion taught this unity of plu­ral­is­tic Gods, and many of Moses’ ad­vis­ers at the time of the ex­o­dus be­lieved in this Trin­ity. But the con­cept of the trini­tar­ian Elo­him never be­came a real part of He­brew the­ol­ogy un­til af­ter they had come un­der the po­lit­i­cal in­flu­ence of the Baby­lo­ni­ans.

96:1.96. Sundry names. The Semites dis­liked to speak the name of their De­ity, and they there­fore re­sorted to nu­mer­ous ap­pel­la­tions from time to time, such as: The Spirit of God, The Lord, The An­gel of the Lord, The Al­mighty, The Holy One, The Most High, Adonai, The An­cient of Days, The Lord God of Is­rael, The Cre­ator of Heaven and Earth, Kyrios, Jah, The Lord of Hosts, and The Fa­ther in Heaven.

96:1.10Je­ho­vah is a term which in re­cent times has been em­ployed to des­ig­nate the com­pleted con­cept of Yah­weh which fi­nally evolved in the long He­brew ex­pe­ri­ence. But the name Je­ho­vah did not come into use un­til fif­teen hun­dred years af­ter the times of Je­sus.

96:1.11Up to about 2000 B.C., Mount Sinai was in­ter­mit­tently ac­tive as a vol­cano, oc­ca­sional erup­tions oc­cur­ring as late as the time of the so­journ of the Is­raelites in this re­gion. The fire and smoke, to­gether with the thun­der­ous det­o­na­tions as­so­ci­ated with the erup­tions of this vol­canic moun­tain, all im­pressed and awed the Bed­ou­ins of the sur­round­ing re­gions and caused them greatly to fear Yah­weh. This spirit of Mount Ho­reb later be­came the god of the He­brew Semites, and they even­tu­ally be­lieved him to be su­preme over all other gods.

96:1.12The Ca­naan­ites had long revered Yah­weh, and al­though many of the Ken­ites be­lieved more or less in El Elyon, the super­god of the Salem re­li­gion, a ma­jor­ity of the Ca­naan­ites held loosely to the wor­ship of the old tribal de­i­ties. They were hardly will­ing to aban­don their na­tional de­i­ties in fa­vor of an in­ter­na­tional, not to say an in­ter­plan­e­tary, God. They were not uni­ver­sal-de­ity minded, and there­fore these tribes con­tin­ued to wor­ship their tribal de­i­ties, in­clud­ing Yah­weh and the sil­ver and golden calves which sym­bol­ized the Bed­ouin herders’ con­cept of the spirit of the Sinai vol­cano.

96:1.13The Syr­i­ans, while wor­ship­ing their gods, also be­lieved in Yah­weh of the He­brews, for their proph­ets said to the Syr­ian king: “Their gods are gods of the hills; there­fore they were stronger than we; but let us fight against them on the plain, and surely we shall be stronger than they.”

96:1.14As man ad­vances in cul­ture, the lesser gods are sub­or­di­nated to a su­preme de­ity; the great Jove per­sists only as an ex­cla­ma­tion. The mono­the­ists keep their sub­or­di­nate gods as spir­its, demons, fates, Nereids, fairies, brown­ies, dwarfs, ban­shees, and the evil eye. The He­brews passed through heno­the­ism and long be­lieved in the ex­is­tence of gods other than Yah­weh, but they in­creas­ingly held that these for­eign de­i­ties were sub­or­di­nate to Yah­weh. They con­ceded the ac­tu­al­ity of Chemosh, god of the Amor­ites, but main­tained that he was sub­or­di­nate to Yah­weh.

96:1.15The idea of Yah­weh has un­der­gone the most ex­ten­sive de­vel­op­ment of all the mor­tal the­o­ries of God. Its pro­gres­sive evo­lu­tion can only be com­pared with the meta­mor­pho­sis of the Bud­dha con­cept in Asia, which in the end led to the con­cept of the Uni­ver­sal Ab­so­lute even as the Yah­weh con­cept fi­nally led to the idea of the Uni­ver­sal Fa­ther. But as a mat­ter of his­toric fact, it should be un­der­stood that, while the Jews thus changed their views of De­ity from the tribal god of Mount Ho­reb to the lov­ing and mer­ci­ful Cre­ator Fa­ther of later times, they did not change his name; they con­tin­ued all the way along to call this evolv­ing con­cept of De­ity, Yah­weh.