The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 84

Marriage and Family Life

Chief of Seraphim

4. Woman’s Status in Early Society

84:4.1Gen­er­ally speak­ing, dur­ing any age woman’s sta­tus is a fair cri­te­rion of the evo­lu­tion­ary prog­ress of mar­riage as a so­cial in­sti­tu­tion, while the prog­ress of mar­riage it­self is a rea­son­ably ac­cu­rate gauge reg­is­ter­ing the ad­vances of hu­man civ­i­liza­tion.

84:4.2Woman’s sta­tus has al­ways been a so­cial para­dox; she has al­ways been a shrewd man­ager of men; she has al­ways cap­i­tal­ized man’s stronger sex urge for her own in­ter­ests and to her own ad­vance­ment. By trad­ing sub­tly upon her sex charms, she has of­ten been able to ex­er­cise dom­i­nant power over man, even when held by him in ab­ject slav­ery.

84:4.3Early woman was not to man a friend, sweet­heart, lover, and part­ner but rather a piece of prop­erty, a ser­vant or slave and, later on, an eco­nomic part­ner, play­thing, and child­bearer. Nonethe­less, proper and sat­is­fac­tory sex re­la­tions have al­ways in­volved the el­e­ment of choice and co-op­er­a­tion by woman, and this has al­ways given in­tel­li­gent women con­sid­er­able in­flu­ence over their im­me­di­ate and per­sonal stand­ing, re­gard­less of their so­cial po­si­tion as a sex. But man’s dis­trust and sus­pi­cion were not helped by the fact that women were all along com­pelled to re­sort to shrewd­ness in the ef­fort to al­le­vi­ate their bond­age.

84:4.4The sexes have had great dif­fi­culty in un­der­stand­ing each other. Man found it hard to un­der­stand woman, re­gard­ing her with a strange mix­ture of ig­no­rant mis­trust and fear­ful fas­ci­na­tion, if not with sus­pi­cion and con­tempt. Many tribal and racial tra­di­tions rel­e­gate trou­ble to Eve, Pan­dora, or some other rep­re­sen­ta­tive of wom­ankind. These nar­ra­tives were al­ways dis­torted so as to make it ap­pear that the woman brought evil upon man; and all this in­di­cates the one­time uni­ver­sal dis­trust of woman. Among the rea­sons cited in sup­port of a celi­bate priest­hood, the chief was the base­ness of woman. The fact that most sup­posed witches were women did not im­prove the olden rep­u­ta­tion of the sex.

84:4.5Men have long re­garded women as pe­cu­liar, even ab­nor­mal. They have even be­lieved that women did not have souls; there­fore were they de­nied names. Dur­ing early times there ex­isted great fear of the first sex re­la­tion with a woman; hence it be­came the cus­tom for a priest to have ini­tial in­ter­course with a vir­gin. Even a woman’s shadow was thought to be dan­ger­ous.

84:4.6Child­bear­ing was once gen­er­ally looked upon as ren­der­ing a woman dan­ger­ous and un­clean. And many tribal mores de­creed that a mother must un­dergo ex­ten­sive pu­rifi­ca­tion cer­e­monies sub­se­quent to the birth of a child. Ex­cept among those groups where the hus­band par­tic­i­pated in the ly­ing-in, the ex­pec­tant mother was shunned, left alone. The an­cients even avoided hav­ing a child born in the house. Fi­nally, the old women were per­mit­ted to at­tend the mother dur­ing la­bor, and this prac­tice gave ori­gin to the pro­fes­sion of mid­wifery. Dur­ing la­bor, scores of fool­ish things were said and done in an ef­fort to fa­cil­i­tate de­liv­ery. It was the cus­tom to sprin­kle the new­born with holy wa­ter to pre­vent ghost in­ter­fer­ence.

84:4.7Among the un­mixed tribes, child­birth was com­par­a­tively easy, oc­cu­py­ing only two or three hours; it is sel­dom so easy among the mixed races. If a woman died in child­birth, es­pe­cially dur­ing the de­liv­ery of twins, she was be­lieved to have been guilty of spirit adul­tery. Later on, the higher tribes looked upon death in child­birth as the will of heaven; such moth­ers were re­garded as hav­ing per­ished in a no­ble cause.

84:4.8The so-called mod­esty of women re­spect­ing their cloth­ing and the ex­po­sure of the per­son grew out of the deadly fear of be­ing ob­served at the time of a men­strual pe­riod. To be thus de­tected was a griev­ous sin, the vi­o­la­tion of a taboo. Un­der the mores of olden times, ev­ery woman, from ado­les­cence to the end of the child­bear­ing pe­riod, was sub­jected to com­plete fam­ily and so­cial quar­an­tine one full week each month. Ev­ery­thing she might touch, sit upon, or lie upon was “de­filed.” It was for long the cus­tom to bru­tally beat a girl af­ter each monthly pe­riod in an ef­fort to drive the evil spirit out of her body. But when a woman passed be­yond the child­bear­ing age, she was usu­ally treated more con­sid­er­ately, be­ing ac­corded more rights and priv­i­leges. In view of all this it was not strange that women were looked down upon. Even the Greeks held the men­stru­at­ing woman as one of the three great causes of de­file­ment, the other two be­ing pork and gar­lic.

84:4.9How­ever fool­ish these olden no­tions were, they did some good since they gave over­worked fe­males, at least when young, one week each month for wel­come rest and prof­itable med­i­ta­tion. Thus could they sharpen their wits for deal­ing with their male as­so­ciates the rest of the time. This quar­an­tine of women also pro­tected men from over-sex in­dul­gence, thereby in­di­rectly con­tribut­ing to the re­stric­tion of pop­u­la­tion and to the en­hance­ment of self-con­trol.

84:4.10A great ad­vance was made when a man was de­nied the right to kill his wife at will. Like­wise, it was a for­ward step when a woman could own the wed­ding gifts. Later, she gained the le­gal right to own, con­trol, and even dis­pose of prop­erty, but she was long de­prived of the right to hold of­fice in ei­ther church or state. Woman has al­ways been treated more or less as prop­erty, right up to and in the twen­ti­eth cen­tury af­ter Christ. She has not yet gained world-wide free­dom from seclu­sion un­der man’s con­trol. Even among ad­vanced peo­ples, man’s at­tempt to pro­tect woman has al­ways been a tacit as­ser­tion of su­pe­ri­or­ity.

84:4.11But prim­i­tive women did not pity them­selves as their more re­cently lib­er­ated sis­ters are wont to do. They were, af­ter all, fairly happy and con­tented; they did not dare to en­vi­sion a bet­ter or dif­fer­ent mode of ex­is­tence.