The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 82

The Evolution of Marriage

Chief of Seraphim

2. The Restrictive Taboos

82:2.1The story of the evo­lu­tion of mar­riage is sim­ply the his­tory of sex con­trol through the pres­sure of so­cial, re­li­gious, and civil re­stric­tions. Na­ture hardly rec­og­nizes in­di­vid­u­als; it takes no cog­nizance of so-called morals; it is only and ex­clu­sively in­ter­ested in the re­pro­duc­tion of the species. Na­ture com­pellingly in­sists on re­pro­duc­tion but in­dif­fer­ently leaves the con­se­quen­tial prob­lems to be solved by so­ci­ety, thus cre­at­ing an ever-pres­ent and ma­jor prob­lem for evo­lu­tion­ary man­kind. This so­cial con­flict con­sists in the un­end­ing war be­tween ba­sic in­stincts and evolv­ing ethics.

82:2.2Among the early races there was lit­tle or no reg­u­la­tion of the re­la­tions of the sexes. Be­cause of this sex li­cense, no pros­ti­tu­tion ex­isted. To­day, the Pyg­mies and other back­ward groups have no mar­riage in­sti­tu­tion; a study of these peo­ples re­veals the sim­ple mat­ing cus­toms fol­lowed by prim­i­tive races. But all an­cient peo­ples should al­ways be stud­ied and judged in the light of the moral stan­dards of the mores of their own times.

82:2.3Free love, how­ever, has never been in good stand­ing above the scale of rank sav­agery. The mo­ment so­ci­etal groups be­gan to form, mar­riage codes and mar­i­tal re­stric­tions be­gan to de­velop. Mat­ing has thus pro­gressed through a mul­ti­tude of tran­si­tions from a state of al­most com­plete sex li­cense to the twen­ti­eth-cen­tury stan­dards of rel­a­tively com­plete sex re­stric­tion.

82:2.4In the ear­li­est stages of tribal de­vel­op­ment the mores and re­stric­tive taboos were very crude, but they did keep the sexes apart—this fa­vored quiet, or­der, and in­dus­try—and the long evo­lu­tion of mar­riage and the home had be­gun. The sex cus­toms of dress, adorn­ment, and re­li­gious prac­tices had their ori­gin in these early taboos which de­fined the range of sex lib­er­ties and thus even­tu­ally cre­ated con­cepts of vice, crime, and sin. But it was long the prac­tice to sus­pend all sex reg­u­la­tions on high fes­ti­val days, es­pe­cially May Day.

82:2.5Women have al­ways been sub­ject to more re­stric­tive taboos than men. The early mores granted the same de­gree of sex lib­erty to un­mar­ried women as to men, but it has al­ways been re­quired of wives that they be faith­ful to their hus­bands. Prim­i­tive mar­riage did not much cur­tail man’s sex lib­er­ties, but it did ren­der fur­ther sex li­cense taboo to the wife. Mar­ried women have al­ways borne some mark which set them apart as a class by them­selves, such as hair­dress, cloth­ing, veil, seclu­sion, or­na­men­ta­tion, and rings.