The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 65

The Overcontrol of Evolution

Life Carrier

2. The Evolutionary Panorama

65:2.1The story of man’s as­cent from sea­weed to the lord­ship of earthly cre­ation is in­deed a ro­mance of bi­o­logic strug­gle and mind sur­vival. Man’s pri­mor­dial an­ces­tors were lit­er­ally the slime and ooze of the ocean bed in the slug­gish and warm-wa­ter bays and la­goons of the vast shore lines of the an­cient in­land seas, those very wa­ters in which the Life Car­ri­ers es­tab­lished the three in­de­pen­dent life im­plan­ta­tions on Uran­tia.

65:2.2Very few species of the early types of ma­rine veg­e­ta­tion that par­tic­i­pated in those ep­ochal changes which re­sulted in the an­i­mallike bor­der­land or­gan­isms are in ex­is­tence to­day. The sponges are the sur­vivors of one of these early mid­way types, those or­gan­isms through which the grad­ual tran­si­tion from the veg­etable to the an­i­mal took place. These early tran­si­tion forms, while not iden­ti­cal with mod­ern sponges, were much like them; they were true bor­der­line or­gan­isms—nei­ther veg­etable nor an­i­mal—but they even­tu­ally led to the de­vel­op­ment of the true an­i­mal forms of life.

65:2.3The bac­te­ria, sim­ple veg­etable or­gan­isms of a very prim­i­tive na­ture, are very lit­tle changed from the early dawn of life; they even ex­hibit a de­gree of ret­ro­gres­sion in their par­a­sitic be­hav­ior. Many of the fungi also rep­re­sent a ret­ro­grade move­ment in evo­lu­tion, be­ing plants which have lost their chloro­phyll-mak­ing abil­ity and have be­come more or less par­a­sitic. The ma­jor­ity of dis­ease-caus­ing bac­te­ria and their aux­il­iary virus bod­ies re­ally be­long to this group of rene­gade par­a­sitic fungi. Dur­ing the in­ter­ven­ing ages all of the vast king­dom of plant life has evolved from an­ces­tors from which the bac­te­ria have also de­scended.

65:2.4The higher pro­to­zoan type of an­i­mal life soon ap­peared, and ap­peared sud­denly. And from these far-dis­tant times the ameba, the typ­i­cal sin­gle-celled an­i­mal or­gan­ism, has come on down but lit­tle mod­i­fied. He dis­ports him­self to­day much as he did when he was the last and great­est achieve­ment in life evo­lu­tion. This minute crea­ture and his pro­to­zoan cousins are to the an­i­mal cre­ation what bac­te­ria are to the plant king­dom; they rep­re­sent the sur­vival of the first early evo­lu­tion­ary steps in life dif­fer­en­ti­a­tion to­gether with fail­ure of sub­se­quent de­vel­op­ment.

65:2.5Be­fore long the early sin­gle-celled an­i­mal types as­so­ci­ated them­selves in com­mu­ni­ties, first on the plan of the Volvox and pres­ently along the lines of the Hy­dra and jel­ly­fish. Still later there evolved the starfish, stone lilies, sea urchins, sea cu­cum­bers, cen­tipedes, in­sects, spi­ders, crus­taceans, and the closely re­lated groups of earth­worms and leeches, soon fol­lowed by the mol­lusks—the oys­ter, oc­to­pus, and snail. Hun­dreds upon hun­dreds of species in­ter­vened and per­ished; men­tion is made only of those which sur­vived the long, long strug­gle. Such non­pro­gres­sive spec­i­mens, to­gether with the later ap­pear­ing fish fam­ily, to­day rep­re­sent the sta­tion­ary types of early and lower an­i­mals, branches of the tree of life which failed to pro­gress.

65:2.6The stage was thus set for the ap­pear­ance of the first back­boned an­i­mals, the fishes. From this fish fam­ily there sprang two unique mod­i­fi­ca­tions, the frog and the sala­man­der. And it was the frog which be­gan that se­ries of pro­gres­sive dif­fer­en­ti­a­tions in an­i­mal life that fi­nally cul­mi­nated in man him­self.

65:2.7The frog is one of the ear­li­est of sur­viv­ing hu­man-race an­ces­tors, but it also failed to pro­gress, per­sist­ing to­day much as in those re­mote times. The frog is the only species an­ces­tor of the early dawn races now liv­ing on the face of the earth. The hu­man race has no sur­viv­ing an­ces­try be­tween the frog and the Es­kimo.

65:2.8The frogs gave rise to the Rep­tilia, a great an­i­mal fam­ily which is vir­tu­ally ex­tinct, but which, be­fore pass­ing out of ex­is­tence, gave ori­gin to the whole bird fam­ily and the nu­mer­ous or­ders of mam­mals.

65:2.9Prob­a­bly the great­est sin­gle leap of all pre­hu­man evo­lu­tion was ex­e­cuted when the rep­tile be­came a bird. The bird types of to­day—ea­gles, ducks, pi­geons, and os­triches—all de­scended from the enor­mous rep­tiles of long, long ago.

65:2.10The king­dom of rep­tiles, de­scended from the frog fam­ily, is to­day rep­re­sented by four sur­viv­ing di­vi­sions: two non­pro­gres­sive, snakes and lizards, to­gether with their cousins, al­li­ga­tors and tur­tles; one par­tially pro­gres­sive, the bird fam­ily, and the fourth, the an­ces­tors of mam­mals and the di­rect line of de­scent of the hu­man species. But though long de­parted, the mas­sive­ness of the pass­ing Rep­tilia found echo in the ele­phant and mastodon, while their pe­cu­liar forms were per­pet­u­ated in the leap­ing kan­ga­roos.

65:2.11Only four­teen phyla have ap­peared on Uran­tia, the fishes be­ing the last, and no new classes have de­vel­oped since birds and mam­mals.

65:2.12It was from an ag­ile lit­tle rep­til­ian di­no­saur of car­niv­o­rous habits but hav­ing a com­par­a­tively large brain that the pla­cen­tal mam­mals sud­denly sprang. These mam­mals de­vel­oped rapidly and in many dif­fer­ent ways, not only giv­ing rise to the com­mon mod­ern va­ri­eties but also evolv­ing into ma­rine types, such as whales and seals, and into air nav­i­ga­tors like the bat fam­ily.

65:2.13Man thus evolved from the higher mam­mals de­rived prin­ci­pally from the west­ern im­plan­ta­tion of life in the an­cient east-west shel­tered seas. The east­ern and cen­tral groups of liv­ing or­gan­isms were early pro­gress­ing fa­vor­ably to­ward the at­tain­ment of pre­hu­man lev­els of an­i­mal ex­is­tence. But as the ages passed, the east­ern fo­cus of life em­place­ment failed to at­tain a sat­is­fac­tory level of in­tel­li­gent pre­hu­man sta­tus, hav­ing suf­fered such re­peated and ir­re­triev­able losses of its high­est types of germ plasm that it was for­ever shorn of the power to re­ha­bil­i­tate hu­man po­ten­tial­i­ties.

65:2.14Since the qual­ity of the mind ca­pac­ity for de­vel­op­ment in this east­ern group was so def­i­nitely in­fe­rior to that of the other two groups, the Life Car­ri­ers, with the con­sent of their su­pe­ri­ors, so ma­nip­u­lated the en­vi­ron­ment as fur­ther to cir­cum­scribe these in­fe­rior pre­hu­man strains of evolv­ing life. To all out­ward ap­pear­ances the elim­i­na­tion of these in­fe­rior groups of crea­tures was ac­ci­den­tal, but in re­al­ity it was al­to­gether pur­pose­ful.

65:2.15Later in the evo­lu­tion­ary un­fold­ing of in­tel­li­gence, the lemur an­ces­tors of the hu­man species were far more ad­vanced in North Amer­ica than in other re­gions; and they were there­fore led to mi­grate from the arena of west­ern life im­plan­ta­tion over the Bering land bridge and down the coast to south­west­ern Asia, where they con­tin­ued to evolve and to ben­e­fit by the ad­di­tion of cer­tain strains of the cen­tral life group. Man thus evolved out of cer­tain west­ern and cen­tral life strains but in the cen­tral to near-east­ern re­gions.

65:2.16In this way the life that was planted on Uran­tia evolved un­til the ice age, when man him­self first ap­peared and be­gan his event­ful plan­e­tary ca­reer. And this ap­pear­ance of prim­i­tive man on earth dur­ing the ice age was not just an ac­ci­dent; it was by de­sign. The rig­ors and cli­matic sever­ity of the glacial era were in ev­ery way adapted to the pur­pose of fos­ter­ing the pro­duc­tion of a hardy type of hu­man be­ing with tremen­dous sur­vival en­dow­ment.