The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 184

Before the Sanhedrin Court

Midwayer Commission

3. Before the Court of Sanhedrists

184:3.1It was about half past three o’clock this Fri­day morn­ing when the chief priest, Cai­a­phas, called the San­hedrist court of in­quiry to or­der and asked that Je­sus be brought be­fore them for his for­mal trial. On three pre­vi­ous oc­ca­sions the San­hedrin, by a large ma­jor­ity vote, had de­creed the death of Je­sus, had de­cided that he was wor­thy of death on in­for­mal charges of law­break­ing, blas­phemy, and flout­ing the tra­di­tions of the fa­thers of Is­rael.

184:3.2This was not a reg­u­larly called meet­ing of the San­hedrin and was not held in the usual place, the cham­ber of hewn stone in the tem­ple. This was a spe­cial trial court of some thirty San­hedrists and was con­vened in the palace of the high priest. John Zeb­e­dee was pres­ent with Je­sus through­out this so-called trial.

184:3.3How these chief priests, scribes, Sad­ducees, and some of the Phar­isees flat­tered them­selves that Je­sus, the dis­turber of their po­si­tion and the chal­lenger of their au­thor­ity, was now se­curely in their hands! And they were re­solved that he should never live to es­cape their venge­ful clutches.

184:3.4Or­di­nar­ily, the Jews, when try­ing a man on a cap­i­tal charge, pro­ceeded with great cau­tion and pro­vided ev­ery safe­guard of fair­ness in the se­lec­tion of wit­nesses and the en­tire con­duct of the trial. But on this oc­ca­sion, Cai­a­phas was more of a pros­e­cu­tor than an un­bi­ased judge.

184:3.5Je­sus ap­peared be­fore this court clothed in his usual gar­ments and with his hands bound to­gether be­hind his back. The en­tire court was star­tled and some­what con­fused by his ma­jes­tic ap­pear­ance. Never had they gazed upon such a pris­oner nor wit­nessed such com­po­sure in a man on trial for his life.

184:3.6The Jew­ish law re­quired that at least two wit­nesses must agree upon any point be­fore a charge could be laid against the pris­oner. Ju­das could not be used as a wit­ness against Je­sus be­cause the Jew­ish law specif­i­cally for­bade the tes­ti­mony of a traitor. More than a score of false wit­nesses were on hand to tes­tify against Je­sus, but their tes­ti­mony was so con­tra­dic­tory and so ev­i­dently trumped up that the San­hedrists them­selves were very much ashamed of the per­for­mance. Je­sus stood there, look­ing down be­nignly upon these per­jur­ers, and his very coun­te­nance dis­con­certed the ly­ing wit­nesses. Through­out all this false tes­ti­mony the Mas­ter never said a word; he made no re­ply to their many false ac­cu­sa­tions.

184:3.7The first time any two of their wit­nesses ap­proached even the sem­blance of an agree­ment was when two men tes­ti­fied that they had heard Je­sus say in the course of one of his tem­ple dis­courses that he would “de­stroy this tem­ple made with hands and in three days make an­other tem­ple with­out hands.” That was not ex­actly what Je­sus said, re­gard­less of the fact that he pointed to his own body when he made the re­mark re­ferred to.

184:3.8Al­though the high priest shouted at Je­sus, “Do you not an­swer any of these charges?” Je­sus opened not his mouth. He stood there in si­lence while all of these false wit­nesses gave their tes­ti­mony. Ha­tred, fa­nati­cism, and un­scrupu­lous ex­ag­ger­a­tion so char­ac­ter­ized the words of these per­jur­ers that their tes­ti­mony fell in its own en­tan­gle­ments. The very best refu­ta­tion of their false ac­cu­sa­tions was the Mas­ter’s calm and ma­jes­tic si­lence.

184:3.9Shortly af­ter the be­gin­ning of the tes­ti­mony of the false wit­nesses, An­nas ar­rived and took his seat be­side Cai­a­phas. An­nas now arose and ar­gued that this threat of Je­sus to de­stroy the tem­ple was suf­fi­cient to war­rant three charges against him:

184:3.101. That he was a dan­ger­ous tra­ducer of the peo­ple. That he taught them im­pos­si­ble things and oth­er­wise de­ceived them.

184:3.112. That he was a fa­nat­i­cal rev­o­lu­tion­ist in that he ad­vo­cated lay­ing vi­o­lent hands on the sa­cred tem­ple, else how could he de­stroy it?

184:3.123. That he taught magic inas­much as he prom­ised to build a new tem­ple, and that with­out hands.

184:3.13Al­ready had the full San­hedrin agreed that Je­sus was guilty of death-de­serv­ing trans­gres­sions of the Jew­ish laws, but they were now more con­cerned with de­vel­op­ing charges re­gard­ing his con­duct and teach­ings which would jus­tify Pi­late in pro­nounc­ing the death sen­tence upon their pris­oner. They knew that they must se­cure the con­sent of the Ro­man gov­er­nor be­fore Je­sus could legally be put to death. And An­nas was minded to pro­ceed along the line of mak­ing it ap­pear that Je­sus was a dan­ger­ous teacher to be abroad among the peo­ple.

184:3.14But Cai­a­phas could not longer en­dure the sight of the Mas­ter stand­ing there in per­fect com­po­sure and un­bro­ken si­lence. He thought he knew at least one way in which the pris­oner might be in­duced to speak. Ac­cord­ingly, he rushed over to the side of Je­sus and, shak­ing his ac­cus­ing fin­ger in the Mas­ter’s face, said: “I ad­jure you, in the name of the liv­ing God, that you tell us whether you are the De­liv­erer, the Son of God.” Je­sus an­swered Cai­a­phas: “I am. Soon I go to the Fa­ther, and pres­ently shall the Son of Man be clothed with power and once more reign over the hosts of heaven.”

184:3.15When the high priest heard Je­sus ut­ter these words, he was ex­ceed­ingly an­gry, and rend­ing his outer gar­ments, he ex­claimed: “What fur­ther need have we of wit­nesses? Be­hold, now have you all heard this man’s blas­phemy. What do you now think should be done with this law­breaker and blas­phe­mer?” And they all an­swered in uni­son, “He is wor­thy of death; let him be cru­ci­fied.”

184:3.16Je­sus man­i­fested no in­ter­est in any ques­tion asked him when be­fore An­nas or the San­hedrists ex­cept the one ques­tion rel­a­tive to his be­stowal mis­sion. When asked if he were the Son of God, he in­stantly and un­equiv­o­cally an­swered in the af­fir­ma­tive.

184:3.17An­nas de­sired that the trial pro­ceed fur­ther, and that charges of a def­i­nite na­ture re­gard­ing Je­sus’ re­la­tion to the Ro­man law and Ro­man in­sti­tu­tions be for­mu­lated for sub­se­quent pre­sen­ta­tion to Pi­late. The coun­cilors were anx­ious to carry these mat­ters to a speedy ter­mi­na­tion, not only be­cause it was the prepa­ra­tion day for the Pass­over and no sec­u­lar work should be done af­ter noon, but also be­cause they feared Pi­late might any time re­turn to the Ro­man cap­i­tal of Judea, Cae­sarea, since he was in Je­ru­sa­lem only for the Pass­over cel­e­bra­tion.

184:3.18But An­nas did not suc­ceed in keep­ing con­trol of the court. Af­ter Je­sus had so un­ex­pect­edly an­swered Cai­a­phas, the high priest stepped for­ward and smote him in the face with his hand. An­nas was truly shocked as the other mem­bers of the court, in pass­ing out of the room, spit in Je­sus’ face, and many of them mock­ingly slapped him with the palms of their hands. And thus in dis­or­der and with such un­heard-of con­fu­sion this first ses­sion of the San­hedrist trial of Je­sus ended at half past four o’clock.

184:3.19Thirty prej­u­diced and tra­di­tion-blinded false judges, with their false wit­nesses, are pre­sum­ing to sit in judg­ment on the righ­teous Cre­ator of a uni­verse. And these im­pas­sioned ac­cusers are ex­as­per­ated by the ma­jes­tic si­lence and su­perb bear­ing of this God-man. His si­lence is ter­ri­ble to en­dure; his speech is fear­lessly de­fi­ant. He is un­moved by their threats and un­daunted by their as­saults. Man sits in judg­ment on God, but even then he loves them and would save them if he could.

The 1955 readings