The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 105

Deity and Reality

Melchizedek

1. The Philosophic Concept of the I AM

105:1.1Ab­so­lute pri­mal cau­sa­tion in in­fin­ity the philoso­phers of the uni­verses at­trib­ute to the Uni­ver­sal Fa­ther func­tion­ing as the in­fi­nite, the eter­nal, and the ab­so­lute I AM.

105:1.2There are many el­e­ments of dan­ger at­ten­dant upon the pre­sen­ta­tion to the mor­tal in­tel­lect of this idea of an in­fi­nite I AM since this con­cept is so re­mote from hu­man ex­pe­ri­en­tial un­der­stand­ing as to in­volve se­ri­ous dis­tor­tion of mean­ings and mis­con­cep­tion of val­ues. Nev­er­the­less, the philo­sophic con­cept of the I AM does af­ford fi­nite be­ings some ba­sis for an at­tempted ap­proach to the par­tial com­pre­hen­sion of ab­so­lute ori­gins and in­fi­nite des­tinies. But in all our at­tempts to elu­ci­date the gen­e­sis and fruition of re­al­ity, let it be made clear that this con­cept of the I AM is, in all per­son­al­ity mean­ings and val­ues, syn­ony­mous with the First Per­son of De­ity, the Uni­ver­sal Fa­ther of all per­son­al­i­ties. But this pos­tu­late of the I AM is not so clearly iden­ti­fi­able in un­de­i­fied realms of uni­ver­sal re­al­ity.

105:1.3The I AM is the In­fi­nite; the I AM is also in­fin­ity. From the se­quen­tial, time view­point, all re­al­ity has its ori­gin in the in­fi­nite I AM, whose soli­tary ex­is­tence in past in­fi­nite eter­nity must be a fi­nite crea­ture’s pre­mier philo­sophic pos­tu­late. The con­cept of the I AM con­notes un­qual­i­fied in­fin­ity, the un­dif­fer­en­ti­ated re­al­ity of all that could ever be in all of an in­fi­nite eter­nity.

105:1.4As an ex­is­ten­tial con­cept the I AM is nei­ther de­i­fied nor un­de­i­fied, nei­ther ac­tual nor po­ten­tial, nei­ther per­sonal nor im­per­sonal, nei­ther static nor dy­namic. No qual­i­fi­ca­tion can be ap­plied to the In­fi­nite ex­cept to state that the I AM is. The philo­sophic pos­tu­late of the I AM is one uni­verse con­cept which is some­what more dif­fi­cult of com­pre­hen­sion than that of the Un­qual­i­fied Ab­so­lute.

105:1.5To the fi­nite mind there sim­ply must be a be­gin­ning, and though there never was a real be­gin­ning to re­al­ity, still there are cer­tain source re­la­tion­ships which re­al­ity man­i­fests to in­fin­ity. The pre­re­al­ity, pri­mor­dial, eter­nity sit­u­a­tion may be thought of some­thing like this: At some in­finitely dis­tant, hy­po­thet­i­cal, past-eter­nity mo­ment, the I AM may be con­ceived as both thing and no thing, as both cause and ef­fect, as both vo­li­tion and re­sponse. At this hy­po­thet­i­cal eter­nity mo­ment there is no dif­fer­en­ti­a­tion through­out all in­fin­ity. In­fin­ity is filled by the In­fi­nite; the In­fi­nite en­com­passes in­fin­ity. This is the hy­po­thet­i­cal static mo­ment of eter­nity; ac­tu­als are still con­tained within their po­ten­tials, and po­ten­tials have not yet ap­peared within the in­fin­ity of the I AM. But even in this con­jec­tured sit­u­a­tion we must as­sume the ex­is­tence of the pos­si­bil­ity of self-will.

105:1.6Ever re­mem­ber that man’s com­pre­hen­sion of the Uni­ver­sal Fa­ther is a per­sonal ex­pe­ri­ence. God, as your spir­i­tual Fa­ther, is com­pre­hen­si­ble to you and to all other mor­tals; but your ex­pe­ri­en­tial wor­ship­ful con­cept of the Uni­ver­sal Fa­ther must al­ways be less than your philo­sophic pos­tu­late of the in­fin­ity of the First Source and Cen­ter, the I AM. When we speak of the Fa­ther, we mean God as he is un­der­stand­able by his crea­tures both high and low, but there is much more of De­ity which is not com­pre­hen­si­ble to uni­verse crea­tures. God, your Fa­ther and my Fa­ther, is that phase of the In­fi­nite which we per­ceive in our per­son­al­i­ties as an ac­tual ex­pe­ri­en­tial re­al­ity, but the I AM ever re­mains as our hy­poth­e­sis of all that we feel is un­know­able of the First Source and Cen­ter. And even that hy­poth­e­sis prob­a­bly falls far short of the un­fath­omed in­fin­ity of orig­i­nal re­al­ity.

105:1.7The uni­verse of uni­verses, with its in­nu­mer­able host of in­hab­it­ing per­son­al­i­ties, is a vast and com­plex or­gan­ism, but the First Source and Cen­ter is in­finitely more com­plex than the uni­verses and per­son­al­i­ties which have be­come real in re­sponse to his will­ful man­dates. When you stand in awe of the mag­ni­tude of the mas­ter uni­verse, pause to con­sider that even this in­con­ceiv­able cre­ation can be no more than a par­tial rev­e­la­tion of the In­fi­nite.

105:1.8In­fin­ity is in­deed re­mote from the ex­pe­ri­ence level of mor­tal com­pre­hen­sion, but even in this age on Uran­tia your con­cepts of in­fin­ity are grow­ing, and they will con­tinue to grow through­out your end­less ca­reers stretch­ing on­ward into fu­ture eter­nity. Un­qual­i­fied in­fin­ity is mean­ing­less to the fi­nite crea­ture, but in­fin­ity is ca­pa­ble of self-lim­i­ta­tion and is sus­cep­ti­ble of re­al­ity ex­pres­sion to all lev­els of uni­verse ex­is­tences. And the face which the In­fi­nite turns to­ward all uni­verse per­son­al­i­ties is the face of a Fa­ther, the Uni­ver­sal Fa­ther of love.