The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 84

Marriage and Family Life

Chief of Seraphim

1. Primitive Pair Associations

84:1.1Mar­riage was not founded on sex re­la­tions; they were in­ci­den­tal thereto. Mar­riage was not needed by prim­i­tive man, who in­dulged his sex ap­petite freely with­out en­cum­ber­ing him­self with the re­spon­si­bil­i­ties of wife, chil­dren, and home.

84:1.2Woman, be­cause of phys­i­cal and emo­tional at­tach­ment to her off­spring, is de­pen­dent on co-op­er­a­tion with the male, and this urges her into the shel­ter­ing pro­tec­tion of mar­riage. But no di­rect bi­o­logic urge led man into mar­riage—much less held him in. It was not love that made mar­riage at­trac­tive to man, but food hunger which first at­tracted sav­age man to woman and the prim­i­tive shel­ter shared by her chil­dren.

84:1.3Mar­riage was not even brought about by the con­scious re­al­iza­tion of the obli­ga­tions of sex re­la­tions. Prim­i­tive man com­pre­hended no con­nec­tion be­tween sex in­dul­gence and the sub­se­quent birth of a child. It was once uni­ver­sally be­lieved that a vir­gin could be­come preg­nant. The sav­age early con­ceived the idea that ba­bies were made in spir­it­land; preg­nancy was be­lieved to be the re­sult of a woman’s be­ing en­tered by a spirit, an evolv­ing ghost. Both diet and the evil eye were also be­lieved to be ca­pa­ble of caus­ing preg­nancy in a vir­gin or un­mar­ried woman, while later be­liefs con­nected the be­gin­nings of life with the breath and with sun­light.

84:1.4Many early peo­ples as­so­ci­ated ghosts with the sea; hence vir­gins were greatly re­stricted in their bathing prac­tices; young women were far more afraid of bathing in the sea at high tide than of hav­ing sex re­la­tions. De­formed or pre­ma­ture ba­bies were re­garded as the young of an­i­mals which had found their way into a woman’s body as a re­sult of care­less bathing or through malev­o­lent spirit ac­tiv­ity. Sav­ages, of course, thought noth­ing of stran­gling such off­spring at birth.

84:1.5The first step in en­light­en­ment came with the be­lief that sex re­la­tions opened up the way for the im­preg­nat­ing ghost to en­ter the fe­male. Man has since dis­cov­ered that fa­ther and mother are equal con­trib­u­tors of the liv­ing in­her­i­tance fac­tors which ini­ti­ate off­spring. But even in the twen­ti­eth cen­tury many par­ents still en­deavor to keep their chil­dren in more or less ig­no­rance as to the ori­gin of hu­man life.

84:1.6A fam­ily of some sim­ple sort was in­sured by the fact that the re­pro­duc­tive func­tion en­tails the mother-child re­la­tion­ship. Mother love is in­stinc­tive; it did not orig­i­nate in the mores as did mar­riage. All mam­malian mother love is the in­her­ent en­dow­ment of the ad­ju­tant mind-spir­its of the lo­cal uni­verse and is in strength and de­vo­tion al­ways di­rectly pro­por­tional to the length of the help­less in­fancy of the species.

84:1.7The mother and child re­la­tion is nat­u­ral, strong, and in­stinc­tive, and one which, there­fore, con­strained prim­i­tive women to sub­mit to many strange con­di­tions and to en­dure un­told hard­ships. This com­pelling mother love is the hand­i­cap­ping emo­tion which has al­ways placed woman at such a tremen­dous dis­ad­van­tage in all her strug­gles with man. Even at that, ma­ter­nal in­stinct in the hu­man species is not over­pow­er­ing; it may be thwarted by am­bi­tion, self­ish­ness, and re­li­gious con­vic­tion.

84:1.8While the mother-child as­so­ci­a­tion is nei­ther mar­riage nor home, it was the nu­cleus from which both sprang. The great ad­vance in the evo­lu­tion of mat­ing came when these tem­po­rary part­ner­ships lasted long enough to rear the re­sul­tant off­spring, for that was home­mak­ing.

84:1.9Re­gard­less of the an­tag­o­nisms of these early pairs, not­with­stand­ing the loose­ness of the as­so­ci­a­tion, the chances for sur­vival were greatly im­proved by these male-fe­male part­ner­ships. A man and a woman, co-op­er­at­ing, even aside from fam­ily and off­spring, are vastly su­pe­rior in most ways to ei­ther two men or two women. This pair­ing of the sexes en­hanced sur­vival and was the very be­gin­ning of hu­man so­ci­ety. The sex di­vi­sion of la­bor also made for com­fort and in­creased hap­pi­ness.