The Urantia Book

Settings

Reading
Theme
Text size
Line spacing

Typeface

Width
Alignment
Show
Listening

Kept in this browser only.

Paper 133

The Return from Rome

Midwayer Commission

6. At Ephesus—Discourse on the Soul

133:6.1On leav­ing Athens, the trav­el­ers went by way of Troas to Eph­esus, the cap­i­tal of the Ro­man prov­ince of Asia. They made many trips out to the fa­mous tem­ple of Artemis of the Eph­esians, about two miles from the city. Artemis was the most fa­mous god­dess of all Asia Mi­nor and a per­pet­u­a­tion of the still ear­lier mother god­dess of an­cient Ana­to­lian times. The crude idol ex­hib­ited in the enor­mous tem­ple ded­i­cated to her wor­ship was re­puted to have fallen from heaven. Not all of Ga­nid’s early train­ing to re­spect im­ages as sym­bols of di­vin­ity had been erad­i­cated, and he thought it best to pur­chase a lit­tle sil­ver shrine in honor of this fer­til­ity god­dess of Asia Mi­nor. That night they talked at great length about the wor­ship of things made with hu­man hands.

133:6.2On the third day of their stay they walked down by the river to ob­serve the dredg­ing of the har­bor’s mouth. At noon they talked with a young Phoeni­cian who was home­sick and much dis­cour­aged; but most of all he was en­vi­ous of a cer­tain young man who had re­ceived pro­mo­tion over his head. Je­sus spoke com­fort­ing words to him and quoted the olden He­brew proverb: “A man’s gift makes room for him and brings him be­fore great men.”

133:6.3Of all the large cities they vis­ited on this tour of the Med­i­ter­ra­nean, they here ac­com­plished the least of value to the sub­se­quent work of the Chris­tian mis­sion­ar­ies. Chris­tian­ity se­cured its start in Eph­esus largely through the ef­forts of Paul, who resided here more than two years, mak­ing tents for a liv­ing and con­duct­ing lec­tures on re­li­gion and phi­los­o­phy each night in the main au­di­ence cham­ber of the school of Tyran­nus.

133:6.4There was a pro­gres­sive thinker con­nected with this lo­cal school of phi­los­o­phy, and Je­sus had sev­eral prof­itable ses­sions with him. In the course of these talks Je­sus had re­peat­edly used the word “soul.” This learned Greek fi­nally asked him what he meant by “soul,” and he replied:

133:6.5“The soul is the self-re­flec­tive, truth-dis­cern­ing, and spirit-per­ceiv­ing part of man which for­ever el­e­vates the hu­man be­ing above the level of the an­i­mal world. Self-con­scious­ness, in and of it­self, is not the soul. Moral self-con­scious­ness is true hu­man self-re­al­iza­tion and con­sti­tutes the foun­da­tion of the hu­man soul, and the soul is that part of man which rep­re­sents the po­ten­tial sur­vival value of hu­man ex­pe­ri­ence. Moral choice and spir­i­tual at­tain­ment, the abil­ity to know God and the urge to be like him, are the char­ac­ter­is­tics of the soul. The soul of man can­not ex­ist apart from moral think­ing and spir­i­tual ac­tiv­ity. A stag­nant soul is a dy­ing soul. But the soul of man is dis­tinct from the di­vine spirit which dwells within the mind. The di­vine spirit ar­rives si­mul­ta­ne­ously with the first moral ac­tiv­ity of the hu­man mind, and that is the oc­ca­sion of the birth of the soul.

133:6.6“The sav­ing or los­ing of a soul has to do with whether or not the moral con­scious­ness at­tains sur­vival sta­tus through eter­nal al­liance with its as­so­ci­ated im­mor­tal spirit en­dow­ment. Sal­va­tion is the spir­i­tu­al­iza­tion of the self-re­al­iza­tion of the moral con­scious­ness, which thereby be­comes pos­sessed of sur­vival value. All forms of soul con­flict con­sist in the lack of har­mony be­tween the moral, or spir­i­tual, self-con­scious­ness and the purely in­tel­lec­tual self-con­scious­ness.

133:6.7“The hu­man soul, when ma­tured, en­no­bled, and spir­i­tu­al­ized, ap­proaches the heav­enly sta­tus in that it comes near to be­ing an en­tity in­ter­ven­ing be­tween the ma­te­rial and the spir­i­tual, the ma­te­rial self and the di­vine spirit. The evolv­ing soul of a hu­man be­ing is dif­fi­cult of de­scrip­tion and more dif­fi­cult of dem­on­stra­tion be­cause it is not dis­cov­er­able by the meth­ods of ei­ther ma­te­rial in­ves­ti­ga­tion or spir­i­tual prov­ing. Ma­te­rial sci­ence can­not demon­strate the ex­is­tence of a soul, nei­ther can pure spirit-test­ing. Not­with­stand­ing the fail­ure of both ma­te­rial sci­ence and spir­i­tual stan­dards to dis­cover the ex­is­tence of the hu­man soul, ev­ery morally con­scious mor­tal knows of the ex­is­tence of his soul as a real and ac­tual per­sonal ex­pe­ri­ence.”